Answer:
C) a positive result from regulatory and economic environmental forces.
Explanation:
In the short run the whole economy will benefit, more American jobs will be created, consumers will probably get good cars at even lower prices, but on the long run the scenario may not be that good for everyone. If Toyota builds the plant, it will be the result of economic and political pressures, and that is a game that two can play, just ask farmers about the trade deal with China.
On the other hand, this is a type of deja vu (or been there, done that), and it ended up with GM and Chrysler bankrupt and Ford barely surviving. This types of policies were enforced in the 1980s by president Reagan and the famous "Made in the USA" by Bruce Springsteen. Back then Honda had a small factory and Toyota was starting to consider building a plant in the US, Nissan hadn't showed up yet. Fast forward a few years and the only good American vehicles are pickups, the Japanese brands wiped out the rest. The country is full of Camrys, Accords, Civics, Corollas, CRVs and Rav4s. They are great cars, too great for the American car manufacturers to compete against. Who knows, with this type of policies maybe in 10 years the only American car manufacturer left will be Tesla.
This is like playing with fire on top of a fuel truck.
Answer:
14.58%
Explanation:
Return on Bond is the actual rate that is received by an investor on investment in bond.
As per given data
After Tax return = 10.50%
Tax Rate = 28%
Deduction of 28% withholding tax will be made on the return of the bond in that country where investment is made and investor will have return net of tax.
We can calculate the after tax return on the bond as follow
After tax return = Before tax return x ( 1 - Tax rate )
10.5% = Before tax return x ( 1 - 28% )
0.105 = Before tax return x ( 1 - 0.28 )
0.105 = Before tax return x 0.72
Before tax return = 0.105 / 0.72
Before tax return = 0.1458 = 14.58%
I shall replace the salesman after discovering that a salesman is receiving kickbacks from my largest customer, analog concerns.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the above mentioned scenario, the salesman is given a kickbacks - "advantages" for either the good relationship that they have maintained with the client or for luring them to always provide them the product/service with discounts.
So in this situation I would obviously replace the salesman because such situations cannot be ignored and there is no assurance that the salesman will not take kickbacks henceforth. And asking for a cut is ethically wrong as the salesman getting the kickbacks.
Answer:
A. N0
B. She may likely bargain for the payments that was reason been that she expects the payments to be in a lower marginal tax bracket in 2021
C. NO
Explanation:
a. No .Based on the information given the amount of $252,000 was NOT constructively received in the year 2020 reason been that She has the amount of $132,000 which is a deferred income amount that
is not constructively received in 2019 and the reason why the amount was not received was because been under the main contract terms she did not have the sole right to receive the income in the year 2020.
b. Freda's willingness to spread her salary over a longer period of time may be due to the fact that She may likely bargain for the payments reason been that she expects the payments to be in a lower marginal tax bracket in the year 2021
c. Based on the information given she is NOT in constructive receipt of the income in the year 2020.
Answer:
Costs are subtracted from revenues.
Explanation:
As we know
Profit is calculated when the cost is subtracted from revenues.
In mathematically,
The profit = Revenues - cost
The profit which would be calculated above is shown in the debit side of the income statement.
As the income statement records all the expenses or cost incurred and all the revenues which are generated
