In the case Gitlow v. New York, Gitlow argued: a) that his First Amendment rights were being violated. b) that he couldn't be co
nvicted of the same crime twice. c) that his Sixth Amendment rights guaranteed him the right to a jury. d) that he couldn't be jailed without being charged with a crime.
that his First Amendment rights were being violated
Explanation:
Gitlow v. New York was a case that was ruled by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 8, 1925 and stated that the First Amendment of the United States Constitution "Protection of Free Speech" also applied to state governments also. According to Gitlow, his article did not precipitate any violent action, but he was yet convicted, which he felt was a violation of his rights to freedom of speech as stated in the First Amendment.
In the case Gitlow v. New York, Gitlow argued: that his First Amendment rights were being violated
Benjamin Gitlow was arrested for distributing a communist pamphlet. He was charged under a New York law that banned the promotion of a revolution. He argued that his First Amendment rights were violated. Right to free speech he argued
The ruling established the practice of selective incorporation. The amendments can be incorporated as needed
This kind of power is referred to as "referent" power.
Referent power is picked up by a pioneer who has solid relational relationship abilities. Referent power in authority is the capacity of a pioneer to develop the regard and adoration of his supporters such that they wish to resemble him. We can also say that referent power is showing others how its done.
