Answer:
maximal ignorance—5
Explanation:
The conclusion is a maximal ignorance because the information presented in the premises is not relevant to the overall argument.
The statement is "True".<span>
<span>Social cues cannot be conveyed because it is related to human
expressions or vocal tones etc. it can be a verbal clue or cue or it can be non-verbal
which guides social interactions. When using digital communications of various
type one cannot use them or express them.</span></span>
Protectionism; theory of practicing, of shielding or protecting from a foreign country by taxing imports.
<u>Answer:</u>
This case was not meant to be a precedent and It was decided in a 5–4 vote.
Option: (A) and (B)
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The Bush v/s Gore case of 2000 was unusual because the Supreme Court decision in the case ordering the initial count to be considered as final brought a wave of mixed responses throughout the United States.
- The decision was voted 5-4 by the Supreme Court bench of 9 justices hearing the case.
- The critics interpreted from the judgment issued that the case was not meant to be taken as a precedent for any cases in the future.
Answer:
Explanation:
Aiello has also pinpointed some present-day conflicts among black leaders, particularly between Dr. Cornel West and Melissa Harris-Perry. West has criticized Harris-Perry and Rev. Al Sharpton for their support of President Barack Obama, who he feels has turned his back on black people.
