Answer: Ocean currents act as conveyor belts of warm and cold water, sending heat toward the polar regions and helping tropical areas cool off, thus influencing both weather and climate. ... Land areas also absorb some sunlight, and the atmosphere helps to retain heat that would otherwise quickly radiate into space after sunset.
Environmental impact statements (EIS) must contain alternate courses of action.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
Environmental impact statements are the statements or the document which is prepared to describe the effects that a particular action that has been proposed will have on the environment. How will that action impact the environment whether in a positive or in the negative way is given in this document.
Here the world environment has been defined as the natural and the physical environment and how and what relation the people have with the environment. It also gives alternative course of action to change the actions in a way which is better for the environment.
Answer:
Neuropsychology
Explanation:
Neuropsychology is the field of study in which the activities of the brain and how these activities influence a person's behavior is studied. And, also, the effect of injuries and brain damages on a person's behavior is studied.
A person who studies the relationship between the brain and behavior is a neuropsychologist. He is a specialist who studies our complex brain system. And they focus on studying the cognitive function and behavior of a person whose brain is damaged or injured.
So, the correct answer is Neuropsychology.
Answer: Self-inventories are also relatively easy to administer and have much higher reliability and validity than projective tests.
Explanation:
A theodicy for some given fact about evil is an explanation for why God would have an all‐things‐considered sufficient reason to allow that evil. The counterpart theodicy relies on a metaphysical claim about existence. We cannot know what "good" is unless there is "evil" to contrast it with. (1) Doesn't justify all kinds of evil (Do we need genocide to know what goodness is?), (2) Doesn't justify the amount of evil (Do we need so much killing/theft to know what goodness is?), (3) God can know good/evil prior to creation/evil.
