The parallel that can be drawn between how I feel about the Parent's Constitution and concern some people might have felt about the U.S. Constitution ratification in 1789 was that New Hampshire became the ninth state to ratify the document and it was subsequently agreed that government under the U.S., the Constitution would begin on March 4, 1789 while the Parent's Constitution is an integral provision/part of the ratified constitution of the U.S.A. Though, the constitution and its provisions have undergone a series of amendments over the years, it has not changed the fact that the parent's constitution is a provision/part of the constitution not an equal document.
<em>The Parent's Constitution would be an integral part of the ratified constitution of the United states.</em>
Explanation:
<em>What can be drawn between how I feel towards the Parent's Constitution and concern some people might have felt about the U.S. Constitution ratification in 1789 was, when the New Hampshire became the ninth state to approve the document, it was agreed subsequently, that on March 4, 1789 the Parent's Constitution would be an integral provision/part of the ratified constitution of the U.S.A, thus, the Constitution would begin under the United states government </em>
<em>Though, the constitution and its provisions have undergone a series of changes over many years, the fact has not changed regarding that the parent's constitution is a provision/part of the constitution not of an equal document.</em>
One similarity between the Magna Carta and the English Bill of Rights is that both documents "<span>(2) placed limits on the power of the monarch" although more so with the Magna Carta. </span>
