If the states are the judges of whether a law is constitutional then what does the supreme court really do. I'm not saying that the citizens shouldn't have a say. It's just that is what the the supreme court does they make the final decision. Either way whether the state or the supreme court comes to a decision someone is going to make a decision. The disadvantage is that the states would be taking away the whole purpose of the supreme court. I guess I can say that a advantage is that as a person you feel as if your having some sort of say in how your state laws are being judged.
-p.s sorry is this didn't help I'm trying:(
The correct answer is, Top to bottom. I just had this question. I've tried the suggested answer, it was wrong.
Understand that, at the time they were drafting the constitution, that each of the states was significantly more genuine and capable than the youngster United States. This trade off spoke the truth what number of delegates every state would send to Congress.
North Africa has three main geographic features: the Sahara desert in the south, the Atlas Mountains in the west, and the Nile River and Delta in the east.
