Answer:
$6.98 per pound
Explanation:
The computation of the selling price per pound is shown below:
As we know that
8 pounds of coffee sells for $9.20 per pound which equal to
= 8 pounds × $9.20 per pound
= $73.6
And, 12 pounds of coffee is for $5.50 per pound which equal to
= 12 pounds × $5.50 per pound
= $66
The total value would be
= $73.6 + $66
= $139.60
And, the total number of pounds would be
= 8 pound + 12 pound
= 20 pounds
And we assume the selling price per pound be X
So, the equation would be
$139.60 = 20 pounds × X
So, X would be
= $139.60 ÷ 20 pounds
= $6.98 per pound
Answer:
The answer is: Physical asset specificity
Explanation:
In a business to business relationship, physical asset specificity refers to an asset, or product or service designed to fit a particular or specialized customer's need.
In this case, True Tomato needs a very specific type of bottle that probably no other ketchup manufacturer may use or want to use. So their bottle supplier specifically manufactures the tomato shaped bottle to meet True Tomato's specific requirements.
Based on the information given the wall is an example of a(n) physical barrier.
Physical barrier is barrier that block or obstruct the flow of communication thereby making it difficult for the receiver to hear.
Physical barrier can tend to lead to ineffective communication between two or more people due to the disruption of failure in communication that occur as a result of the barrier.
Wall is an example of physical barrier as they can prevent effective communication thereby by making it hard for the receiver to hear what the sender communicated to him or her.
Inconclusion the wall is an example of a(n) physical barrier.
Learn more about physical barrier here:brainly.com/question/902393
Answer:
Assuming that no changes happened, 2020 sales and expenses should be similar to 2019's:
Total Per unit
Total sales $1,842,400 $28
Variables costs <u>($1,184,400)</u> <u>($18)</u>
Contribution margin $658,000 $10
Fixed costs <u>($498,000)</u> <u>($7.57)</u>
Operating income $160,000 $2.43
Given the table below
![\begin{tabular} {|p {1cm}|p {1.4cm}|p {1.4cm}|p {1.5cm}|p {1.4cm}|p {1.4cm}|} {Price per hour&Quantity Supplied by Ann&Quantity Supplied by Bob&Quantity Supplied by Carlos&Market Quantity Supplied&Market Quantity Demanded\\[1ex] \$50&94&35&19&148&5\\ 45&93&33&14&140&8\\ 40&90&30&10&130&11\\ 35&81&27&6&114&16\\ 30&68&20&2&90&22\\ 25&50&12&0&62&30\\ 20&32&7&0&39&39\\ 15&20&0&0&20&47\\ 10&10&0&0&10&57 \end{tabular}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Btabular%7D%0A%7B%7Cp%20%7B1cm%7D%7Cp%20%7B1.4cm%7D%7Cp%20%7B1.4cm%7D%7Cp%20%7B1.5cm%7D%7Cp%20%7B1.4cm%7D%7Cp%20%7B1.4cm%7D%7C%7D%0A%7BPrice%20per%20hour%26Quantity%20Supplied%20by%20Ann%26Quantity%20Supplied%20by%20Bob%26Quantity%20Supplied%20by%20Carlos%26Market%20Quantity%20Supplied%26Market%20Quantity%20Demanded%5C%5C%5B1ex%5D%0A%5C%2450%2694%2635%2619%26148%265%5C%5C%0A45%2693%2633%2614%26140%268%5C%5C%0A40%2690%2630%2610%26130%2611%5C%5C%0A35%2681%2627%266%26114%2616%5C%5C%0A30%2668%2620%262%2690%2622%5C%5C%0A25%2650%2612%260%2662%2630%5C%5C%0A20%2632%267%260%2639%2639%5C%5C%0A15%2620%260%260%2620%2647%5C%5C%0A10%2610%260%260%2610%2657%0A%5Cend%7Btabular%7D)
From the table it can be seen that at the price of $20, the quantity supplied is equal to the quantity demanded equal to 39.
Also notice that at that price, Carlos is not supplying any service.
Therefore, the equilibruim price <span>of tutoring services be if Carlos decided to stop tutoring is $20.</span>
