All categories

3 years ago

Generally, regardless of threat or vulnerability, there will ____________ be a chance a threat can exploit a vulnerability.

Business

1 answer:

ehidna [41]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "C": always.

Explanation:

Vulnerability management is responsible for the prevention, identification, and elimination of threats that might exploit vulnerabilities in a software system. After the threat has obtained unauthorized access, the threat will damage or destroy the software and no matter how big the software's weakness is, a threat will exploit it.

You might be interested in

At the time of Elise’s 20 year high school reunion she was earning $50,000 and the CPI was 80. Now that it is time for her to at

babunello [35]

Answer:

Her real income has decrease by $7,333.33

Explanation:

<em>Real income is the amount of goods and services that a give amount of quantity money can purchase. It is also known as the purchasing power of money. </em>

To determine if there has been a change in her real income, we will compare her real income 20 years ago to her real income 5 years later. This will be done as follows;

Step 1

Determine her real income 5 years after her last reunion

Real income in current year = (CPI in base year/CPI in current year ) × Nominal income

= (80/150)× 80,000

= $42,666.67

Step 2

Determine change in real income

Her real income has decrease by $7,333.33. This is difference between her real income 5 years ago and now. That is $50,000 - $42,666.67.

Tis implies she cannot purchase as much as she could 5 years ago because of inflation.

3 0

3 years ago

Dr. Riley, a professor in the economics department, finds that if he keeps his door open, people tend to stop in to say hello. T

Archy [21]

Answer:

1) Mindfulness

Explanation:

Mindfulness refers to being aware of your environment and paying attention to what happens around you, and at the same time being aware of your thoughts and bodily sensations.

In other words, it means that Dr. Riley is able to concentrate on what he is doing and at the same time is paying attention to what is around him.

4 0

3 years ago

Lucas Laboratories' last dividend was $1.50. Its current equilibrium stock price is $15.75, and its expected growth rate is a co

Elis [28]

Answer:

Expected dividend yield = 10.0%

Expected capital gains yield = 5.0%

Explanation:

D0 = $1.50 (Given)

E(D1) = D0 * (1 + g) = $1.50 * (1.05) = $1.575

E(P0) = $15.75 (Given)

E(P1) = $15.75 * (1.05)1 = $16.5375

Expected dividend yield = E(D1) / E(P0)

= $1.575 / $15.75 = 0.100 = 10.0%

Expected capital gains yield = (E(P1) - E(P0)) / E(P0)

($16.5375 - $15.75) / $15.75 = 0.050 = 5.0%

4 0

3 years ago

An investor in Treasury securities expects inflation to be 1.6% in Year 1, 3.05% in Year 2, and 3.85% each year thereafter. Assu

mixer [17]

Answer:

The difference between two securities is 0.89%.

Explanation:

Inflation premium for the next three and five years:

Inflation premium (3) = (1.6% + 3.05% + 3.85%) ÷ 3

= 2.83%

Inflation premium (5) = (1.6% + 3.05% + 3.85% + 3.85% + 3.85%) ÷ 5

= 3.24%

Real risk-free rate = 2.35%

Since default premium and liquidity premium are zero on treasury bonds, we can now solve for the maturity risk premium:

Three-year Treasury securities = Real risk-free rate + Inflation premium (3) + MRP(3)

6.80% = 2.35% + 2.83% + MRP(3)

MRP (3) = 1.62%

Similarly,

5-year Treasury securities = Real risk-free rate + Inflation premium (5) + MRP(5)

8.10% = 2.35% + 3.24% + MRP(3)

MRP (5) = 2.51%

Thus,

MRP5 - MRP3 = 2.51% - 1.62%

= 0.89%

Therefore, the difference between two securities is 0.89%.

4 0

3 years ago

One of the lessons that we learned from the Ford Pinto case was that:_________

Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Answer: option 3

Explanation:

Background to the case:

The cases involving the explosion of Ford Pinto's due to a defective fuel system design led to the debate of many issues, most centering around the use by Ford of a cost-benefit analysis and the ethics surrounding its decision not to upgrade the fuel system based on this analysis.

Basis of analysis:

Should a risk/benefit analysis be used in situations where a defect in manufacturing could lead to seriously bodily harm and even worse death, such as in the Ford Pinto situation?

Rule of the court:

There hasn’t really been a definite decision about the case and arguments both for and against such an analysis have been made. It is an economically efficient method which has been accepted by courts for numerous years, however, juries may not always agree, so companies should take this into account.

Discretion is expected to be used.

6 0

3 years ago