Being original , it’s not really creative
<span>Notice a couple of things
different between (A) and (B). It was NOT the first time a biologist
proposed that species changed through time (so it's not B). But it
finally *solidified* that idea by giving "change through time"
(evolution) a MECHANISM. It gave a plausible explanation for WHY
species change over time, in a testable way that made sense and had
evidence to support it.
So it finally dismissed the idea that species are constant.
It also emphasized that the simple presence of *variation* within a population was a key reason for evolution.
While we're at it ... (C) is wrong because it's not *individuals* that
acclimate (adapt) to their environment, but the population (the species)
as a whole.
And (D) is wrong because it had nothing to do with economics or the monarchy.</span>
Generation-to-generation change in the allele frequencies in a population is _____.
a. genetic drift b. natural selection c. macroevolution d. mutation e. Microevolution
Answer:
e. Microevolution
Explanation:
Microevolution refers to the small changes in the allele frequencies and the genotype frequencies of the populations. These changes occur over a few generations and deviate the populations from the genetic equilibrium.
The processes responsible for microevolution are mutations, genetic drift, gene flow, etc. Similarly, sexual selection and nonrandom mating also change the allele frequencies of the populations. Likewise, natural selection brings about microevolution by increasing the frequencies of the alleles that impart the beneficial traits to the organisms.
Answer:
ok I don't know the first one
2.nucleus is the power of cell and that make a new organisms and also it control all of cell activities.
3.green
4.ya b/c it is made or get in green pigment.
5.that is unspecified of plant cell and get in chloroplaste.
There would be dead animals overloading the Earth. Think about it, without worms and other things that break down dead things they would still be here and just sit there.
