Answer:
distrustful of the British
used enslaved Africans
allowed to keep their country
Explanation:
Strong initiative, independence and decisiveness are characteristics of the boer, developing out of their pioneering spirit and the difficult circumstances of their early history and the political dominance of the British.
The Afrikaans are also known as the “Boers,” the Dutch word for “farmers.” To aid them in agriculture, the Europeans imported slaves from places such as Malaysia and Madagascar while enslaving some local tribes, such as the Khoikhoi and San.
The South African Boer War begins between the British Empire and the Boers of the Transvaal and Orange Free State. The Boers, also known as Afrikaners, were the descendants of the original Dutch settlers of southern Africa.
By 1902, the British had crushed the Boer resistance, and on May 31 of that year, the Peace of Vereeniging was signed, ending hostilities. The treaty recognized the British military administration over Transvaal and the Orange Free State, and authorized a general amnesty for Boer forces.
Many of these farmers settled in the fertile lands around Cape Town and used slaves, some of whom were brought in from other Dutch territories, to work their farms. The colony was administered by the Dutch East India Company for nearly 150 years
Answer:
Para poder ejercer la ciudadanía global con menos limitaciones, propondría a los líderes globales dos medidas fundamentales:
-por un lado, les recomendaría la creación de un área de libre comercio global, al estilo de la Unión Europea, con eliminación permanente de aranceles de todo tipo. Así, los bienes de consumo se convertirían en accesibles a toda la población, reduciéndose la pobreza y aumentándose la productividad y el rendimiento de los mercados, que podrían vender más a un menor precio, llegando al punto de eficiencia de mercado.
-por otro lado, les recomendaría flexibilizar las políticas migratorias y de movimiento de personas, para que estas sean quienes decidan en qué país y bajo que condiciones vivir. Así, cada país debería llevar a cabo una serie de medidas destinadas a fomentar la migración o la permanencia en su territorio, a través de políticas fiscales e impositivas favorables a sus ciudadanos, lo que redundaría en una mejor calidad de vida para estos.
The coattail effect is defined as the inclination for a well-known political party pioneer to pull in votes in favor of different applicants of a similar party in a decision. For instance, in the United States, the gathering of a successful presidential hopeful will frequently win numerous seats in Congress also; these Members of Congress are casted a ballot into office "on the coattails" of the president.
On the contrary, a new conception of this tendency is the reverse coattail effect, that initially was a term authored by Ames (1994) and it is more specifically understood as managing the ability of neighborhood party associations to transfer votes to upper dimensions party candidates by focusing on the causal appointive impact of electing a mayor over subsequent statewide relative elections.
A good example of this is the office day national run in Virginia, where as quoted from Huffpost newspaper: “These victories provided an enormous boost to statewide candidates. In districts with highly competitive Delegate races in Virginia, Democratic vote turnout increased by 40 percent. That is a phenomenon that we refer to as “reverse coattails.” Essentially, it means that the folks running for state and local offices were responsible for increasing turnout for statewide candidates like Governor, Lieutenant Governor, and Attorney General. In all but one of our Virginia House races, our candidates performed better than Gov. McAuliffe did in 2013.”
Sources:
AMES, B. "The Reverse Coattails Effect: Local Party Organization in the 1989 Brazilian Presidential Election." American Political Science Review, v. 88, n. 1, p. 95-111, 1994
Ross Morales Rocketto. “Reverse Coattails’ Is A Real Thing. That’s why we need you to step up on National Run for Office Day. Updated Nov 14, 2017
True, false i’m pretty sure
Answer:
The most widely known development theory is modernization theory, which is a perspective that links global inequality to different levels of economic development and suggests that low-income economies can move to middle- and high-income economies by achieving self-sustained economic growth.
Explanation:
Modernization theory both attempts to identify the social variables that contribute to social progress and development of societies and seeks to explain the process of social evolution. Modernization theory is subject to criticism originating among socialist and free-market ideologies, world-systems theorists, globalization theorists and dependency theorists among others. Modernization theory stresses not only the process of change but also the responses to that change. It also looks at internal dynamics while referring to social and cultural structures and the adaptation of new technologies. Modernization theory maintains that traditional societies will develop as they adopt more modern practices. Proponents of modernization theory claim that modern states are wealthier and more powerful and that their citizens are freer to enjoy a higher standard of living. Developments such as new data technology and the need to update traditional methods in transport, communication and production, it is argued, make modernization necessary or at least preferable to the status quo. That view makes critique difficult since it implies that such developments control the limits of human interaction, not vice versa.
