The answer is that the pilots decided to proceed to a secondary location, and they found and attacked Japanese carriers.
Instead of returning to base, aviators made what Admiral Nimitz would later call "one of the most important decisions of the battle."
The pilots then proceeded to an unlikely secondary location. There, they found the Japanese carriers — unprepared. Immediately, fighters destroyed one of the four Japanese vessels. Other Americans rushed onto the scene to continue the attack. This event shifted the tide of battle to favor the Americans, wresting victory from Japanese hands.
Ignore the administrative procedure act to streamline proceedings
Answer:
(A). Accommodation
Explanation:
Accommodation explains what happens when new knowledge or experiences cause you to change your current schemas(Schemes are the techniques that children employ during adaptation). Instead of making the new information work in an existing system, you change the schema to suit the new information.
Accommodation is a Part of the Adaptation Process.
Baby Stephanie was first given a cup to drink out of, rather than her bottle, she tried to use it just like a bottle, but kept pouring milk on herself. After a few tries, however she was able to drink out of the cup with minimal spilling. According to Piaget this would be an example of ACCOMMODATION.
Accommodation explains how we later adapt our systems to integrate new experiences more effectively.
1. nation- sizable group with shared political aspirations who share a common root// common history
2. state- recognized political unit with permanently populated territory with BOUNDARIES and a government with sovereignty over domestic and international affairs
hope this helped I just did this chapter and got 100 on final test :))
The correct answre is D.
Citizens United v. FEC
was a case which led to the enactment of a landmark decision by the US Supreme Court in 2010.
The Federal Election Comission, a conservative non-profit organization, broadcasted an advertsiment against the aspiration of Hilary Clinton during the 2008 presidential election. Such ad had an audience superior to 50,000.
The freedom of speech right, guaranteed by the First Amendment to the US Constitution, states that goverment cannot limit communications financed with private funds and performed by nonprofit corporations, for-profit corporations, labor unions, and other associations.
On the other hand, the federal law explicitly prohibits such organizations from "electioneering communication" in the 60 days prior to the election, if these communications reach more than 50,000 people from the electorate. <u>Therefore, the US Supreme Court declared that the Federal Election Comission had acted against the federal law and the US Constitution. </u>
