Since Southern blacks were not allowed to fight in the Civil War, they were able to contribute to the war effort by joining the army despite the rules against it. Thank you for posting your question. I hope this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure it is A
Explanation:
I did something like this about a few months back on edge
If I was an ordinary person in my 1930s and aged 40 with a middle income job such as an 'office assistant', I would not be in favour of helping other countries.
I would personally prefer a policy of isolation from the rest of the world. Primarily, this would be because I had seen with my very won eyes, the death and destruction bought on by World War I and more importantly the Great Depression.
With millions of job less people, poverty and people barely making ends meet, I would want our government to concentrate on the welfare of our own people, rather than go to war with countries thousands of miles away.
Oral historians, because many of the ancient civilizations got passed down beliefs which led them to be able to get their customs and beliefs through oral historians
Nationalism is the identification with one's own nation and to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations. Hence the effect is negative.
<h3>Effect of nationalism on networks, production and distribution</h3>
Nationalism affect networks, production and distribution in such a way that a significant proportion of consumers will not be willing to buy imported produce from countries that are in conflict with theirs. Hence, those whose ethnocentric and economic-centric relationship are strong would exhibit this trait.
The implication is that networking of good to to such country will be distorted, low production may set in, and by extension, distribution may need to follow other channels.
Therefore, the effects will be enormous and very negative to the producing countries.
learn more about nationalism: brainly.com/question/1287645
