Answer:
What is your favorite color?
Explanation:
I like ice cream :D
According to what is expressed in the fragment, it can be inferred that the purpose of the sentence is to clarify that laws are created to modify human behavior.
<h3>What is a law?</h3>
A law is a term to refer to a norm or rule of society that citizens must comply with in order to live in harmony with others.
Laws are one of the oldest social tools in the world because they guarantee that citizens have a more controlled behavior with respect to others. Additionally, this provides them with some obligations that they must fulfill to belong to the social group.
According to the above, it can be inferred that the fragment refers to the fact that laws are an adequate tool to modify human behavior according to the needs of society.
Learn more about law in: brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ1
Answer:
do the challenge in brainly it gives u points !!!!
Explanation:
Answer:
ye
Explanation:
we know that lol. btw do u have a licence.
Answer:
GHB Sdn Bhd and Sandhu
The prospect for Sandhu to recover the extra commission negotiated with Ahmad during golf is very remote.
1. It was made under undue influence, when Ahmad could have lacked the capacity to make a binding contract. In addition, at that time, Sandhu disclosed that the land was being sought after by many other parties as a way of piling unnecessary pressure on Ahmad.
2. There was no intention to create a legal relation because the additional commission represents a counter-offer. Since the earlier offer was fully documented, this additional offer should have also followed the same process if the company intended to be legally bound.
3. There is lack of consideration to back this additional contract. In the first place, the main contract with Sandhu was made in view of his negotiation skills. So what is Sandhu expected to offer the company in exchange for the extra commission? Nothing.
Explanation:
GHB cannot be expected to promise 0.5% extra commission on a deal, which was equivalent to RM2 million, when an already executed contract for 3% commission had been reached. One can also claim that Ahmad, who suffered from occasional dementia, could have made the promise without the intention for it to be binding on his company but as a way of encouraging Sandhu to close the deal in favor of GHB. Was the deal closed because of the extra commission? No.
