1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stiv31 [10]
3 years ago
6

Which of the following cannot be considered a benefit of implementing HACCP?

Law
2 answers:
Alex17521 [72]3 years ago
5 0

HACCP education and high turnover of employees and on farm it may increase the sanitation and safety levels of domestic lifestock products cannot be considered a benefit of implementing HACCP.

Explanation:

HACCP is Hazard Analysis Critical control point curriculum are the primary manual used for training the fish and fishery products, hazards and control guide published by the FDA.

The disadvantages of implementing HACCP are increased production and supervisory cost, and availability of staff time is less for other tasks, cost of implementation and reduced flexibility in production process and introduction of new process. The lack of understanding about HACCP, lack of time, staff turn over, employee motivation and lack of personal training are the main barriers of implementation.

Mekhanik [1.2K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:idk but i need help as well

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which amendment is most responsible for protecting citizens' liberties from intrusion by state governments?
zzz [600]

Answer: The Fourteenth Amendment

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
Your line of sight is:
Yakvenalex [24]

A. The path from your eyes to the object they're viewing

7 0
3 years ago
Please someone help!
Elan Coil [88]

Answer:

IT DONT SHOW KNOW QUESTION

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
The different parts of the disaster management cycle generate different planning requirements. In a similar way, levels of plans
vladimir1956 [14]
Yes becausd diaster requirments
4 0
2 years ago
What are the fundamental principles of the Faragher v. City of Boca Raton and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth cases in th
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

B. Employers are not liable for the acts of their supervisors, regardless of whether the employer is aware of the sexual harassment act.

Explanation:

In this case, the Supreme Court mentioned that an employer isat risk. That means that the empolyer does nor have a defense when sexual harassment by a supervisor involves a tangible employment action. Courts hope that employers educate supervisors so they do not commit any type of behavior that could be considered as sexual harassment. Also, all employees must be educated so as to understand their rights and responsibilities .

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In order for a plaintiff to win a case involving intentional infliction of emotional distress, one should
    11·1 answer
  • In how many states are the Republican and Democratic parties recognized?
    14·1 answer
  • True or False: Lobbyists gain access to government officials by donating to campaigns.
    10·2 answers
  • What is the difference between probation supervision and intensive probation supervision
    14·1 answer
  • This question is from Business Law
    7·1 answer
  • Want fifty points? Well here u go. LOL
    11·1 answer
  • 6. Depth perception, color recognition, and
    5·2 answers
  • Qué significa ser representativo? y explicar-interpretar el articulo 22 de la C.N Argentina
    15·1 answer
  • If you are justice please do not lie<br>what is the price for your blind eye?​
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following people is the best-known example of a policy entrepreneur?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!