Answer:
investment after 6 years = $129.80
Explanation:
given data
invested = $110
simple interest = 3%
period = 6 years
to find out
How much will his investment be worth after 6 years
solution
first we get here interest that is express as
interest = invested amount × rate × time ..................1
interest = $110 × 3% × 6
interest = $19.8
and
investment after 6 years = invested amount + interest .................2
investment after 6 years = $110 + $19.8
investment after 6 years = $129.80
Answer:
ROE would have changed by 8.52%
Explanation:
First we calculate the current ROE using Dupont Equation which gives ROE as,
ROE = Net Income/Sales * Sales/Total Assets * Total Assets/Equity
or
ROE = Net Profit Margin * Total Assets Turnover * Equity Multiplier
- Current ROE = 10600/295000 * 1.4 * 1.75 = 0.0880 or 8.8%
The condition says that the net income could have increased to 20850 but other factors will remain constant. Thus, to calculate new ROE, we will calculate the new Net Profit margin but the total assets turnover and the equity multiplier will remain constant as sales assets and capital structure is not changing.
- New ROE = 20850/295000 * 1.4 * 1.75 = 0.17316 or 17.32%
- The ROE would have changed by 17.32 - 8.80 = 8.52%
Answer:
$11,650
Explanation:
The adjusted cash balance per bank at August 31 2022 is calculated as;
= Cash balance per bank - Outstanding checks + Deposits in transits
Given that;
Cash balance per bank = $10,690
Outstanding checks = $840
Deposits in transits = $1,800
= $10,690 - $840 + $1,800
= $11,650
Therefore the adjusted cash balance per bank is $11,650. It means that the cash balance per bank statement has to be adjusted to accommodate outstanding checks and deposits in transit. For outstanding checks , they are checks that have not yet been found on the bank statement , while deposits in transit are those deposits, that have not yet been found or appear on the bank statement.
The argument above is a deductive reasoning. A deductive reasoning draws a conclusion from a series of premises that are held to be true. The argument also employs no informal fallacy. The confusion lies though on the first premise if it is true.
Answer:
Instructions are below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Job 765:
Direct material= $5,670
Direct labor= $3,500
Machine Hours= 27
Job 766:
Direct material= $8,900
Direct labor= $4,775
Machine Hours= 44
Job 765 produced 152 units, and Job 766 consisted of 250 units.
Assuming that the predetermined overhead rate is applied by using machine hours at a rate of $200 per hour.
Costs sheet:
<u>Job 765:</u>
Direct material= 5,670
Direct labor= 3,500
Allocated overhead= 200*27= 5,400
Total cost= 14,570
Unitary cost= 14,570/152= $95.85
<u>Job 766:</u>
Direct material= 8,900
Direct labor= 4,775
Allocated overhead= 200*44= 8,800
Total cost= 22,475
Unitary cost= 22,475/250= $89.9