You can’t factor 31 since it’s a prime number luv
Answer:
x = 2.
Step-by-step explanation:
5[3(x + 4) − 2(1 − x)] − x − 15 = 14x + 55
5[3x + 12 - 2 + 2x] - x - 15 = 14x + 55
5[5x + 10] - x - 15 = 14x + 55
25x + 50 - x - 15 = 14x + 55 Now we subtract 14x from both sides:
25x + 50 - x - 15 - 14x = 14x - 14x + 55
10x + 50 - 15 = 55 Now we subtract 50, add 15 to both sides:
10x + 50 - 50 - 15 + 15 = 55 - 50 + 15
10x = 20
x = 2.
Answer:
12
Step-by-step explanation:
When the numerators are the same, the denominator that is bigger has a lesser value. In this case, the inequality > shows that 
is bigger than the fraction next to it so in order to find a fraction that is lesser in value than , we need to find a denominator that is <u>more than 10</u>, since 10 is the denominator of the first fraction. The only number more than 10 in the options is 12, so 12 is the answer.
F(C) = 9/5C + 32
I'll just change F(C) to y and 9/5C to 9/5x.
y = 9/5x + 32
inverse...
x = 9/5y + 32
9/5y = x - 32
y = 5/9x - 160/9
Sooooo
F(C) = 5/9C - 160/9
Answer:
ΔABC≅ΔDEC by AAS
Step-by-step explanation:
You can use the AAS method of congruency.
Since you already have <BAC and <EDC congruent to eachother, and sides BC and EC congruent to each other, you only need that one remaining angle in between. <ACB can be proven congruent to <DCE by the Vertical Angles Theorem, and that gives you the AAS you need to prove that these two triangles are congruent
Hope this helped.
