We could do it with algebra. But we can also do it the long way, which is
shorter than the algebraic way.
The digit in the tens place is 3 times the digit in the units place.
So the number MUST be
31, or
62, or
93 .
It can't be anything else.
Now here they are again, with the reverse of each one:
31 . . . 13 The new number is 18 less.
62 . . . 26 The new number is 36 less.
93 . . . 39 The new number is 54 less.
Obviously, the original number is 62.
Its 3.000+400+5 that's your answer
Answer:
$230
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:\
my quick answer for you would be to look is there is a website on the paper so that way you can search online and see what they give you.
Answer:
1. Translation 3 units to the right;
2. Reflection across the x-axis;
3. Translation 4 units up.
Step-by-step explanation:
First, rewrite the function 
in following way:
Apply such transformations:
1. Translate the graph of the parent function 
3 units to the right to get the graph of the function 
2. Reflect the graph of the function 
across the x-axis to get the graph of the function 
3. Translate the graph of the function 
4 units up to get the graph of the function 
