The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock is a piece by T. S. Eliot. The piece uses the ceaseless stream technique to tell a discourse of a regular individual.
<h3>Which best describes the meaning of these lines?</h3>
Correct answer is Option A
- The speaker feels hesitant to take action because he is insecure about himself.
In this sonnet, the principle character, Prufrock, is attempting to assemble the fortitude to pose a vital inquiry to a lady. What's more he discusses how he has figured out how to change and adjust to the social way of life of his circle.
While he is discussing posing or not the inquiry, choice that he at last decreases, he contemplates whether by posing this inquiry he would establish an unevenness on the climate that he has adjusted to.
This man encounters outrageous withdrawal and misery. Furthermore, he feels unequipped for taking action to change his situation. He has no conviction on his abilities, which prompts immense disappointment and a mourn over lost opportunities.
Therefore, correct answer is option A.
For more information about The Love Song , refer the following link:
brainly.com/question/12955909
So a noun clause is a dependent clause that acts as a noun. Noun clauses begin with words such as how, that, what, whatever, when, where, whether, which, whichever, who, whoever, whom, whomever, and why. Noun clauses can act as subjects, direct objects, indirect objects, predicate nominatives, or objects of a preposition.
Homophones are words that are pronounced the same but mean different things, so the answer is blue.
Answer:
c. Deductive, analogy
Explanation:
In this scenario, the argument being made would be classified as a deductive analogy. An analogy basically compares two things together in order to explain an idea, most of the time these two things have something in common that allows that idea to be better understood. In this scenario, they are comparing a rabid dog and an unexploded bomb. Since the unexploded bomb is the object that the rabid dog is being compared to it would be considered the conclusion, and since the conclusion is being applied first in the second part of the argument you are therefore using deductive logic.
