This is a case in which apparently students can appeal to the fulfillment of the First Amendment that states the Freedom of Speech but I think that we have to remember that in any case our rights finish when we interfere with other peoples's rights.
I believe that schools, teachers and parents must get an agreement about what is good and bad for students because they are not mature enough to decide by themselves.
In the case Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier the supreme court rules in favor of the school board and make the difference between a private forum and a public forum stating that a school is a private forum.
Imagine that students were allowed to do whatever they want and present whatever play they wish then the school would have no rules and when a place has no rules it becomes jungle law
This will lead to openness or Privacy Dialectic. Privacy dialectic captures the wish or longing for both intimacy while we desire or get distance between ourselves and others. The open–closed dialectic is the inner fight stuck between our expression and privacy.
Answer: Jews, Gays, Gypsies, Handicaps, Christians, Transgenders etc.
Explanation:
1. D. Northern
2. A. True
3. D. The prime minister officially apologized on behalf of all Australians.
4. A. 2.5
5. A. European diseases
Trader, dealer, trafficker, wholesaler, agent, buyer
