Joe walks into Best Buy prepared to spend no more than $500 cash on a new computer, but the price turns out to be $600. Joe is t
old if he finances it on a Best Buy credit card, it will cost $600, but he will get a $25 gift card free with the computer. Joe opts to open the credit card and puts the full $600 on the account. According to economic theory, Joe's decision is:
Irrational decisions refer to those decisions which are not taken after enough deliberation, ignore the rationale, facts and logic, are rather decided out of whim and impulse and usually instantly decided.
In the given case, Joe was not willing to pay more than $500 cash yet eventually ended up paying $600. Even if the $25 gift card is considered, he ended up paying $575 which is more than he had decided to pay.
The choice of the consumer here is not rational or rather irrational since, he without considering other alternatives or exercise of judgement, without evaluating his costs, impulsively opted for the credit card lured by $25 gift card.
As per the economic theory, Joe's decision would be referred to as irrational.
This is an example of a moral hazard. This is a condition
in which one party gets convoluted in a dangerous occurrence knowing that it is
sheltered in contradiction of the risk and the other party will suffer the
cost. It arises when mutually the parties have imperfect information about each
other.
When the price of a commodity is $11, where 1250 units are being bought and sold in a perfectly competitive market, the market price of the commodity will increase from its original price if the market is monopolized.
<h3>What is a perfectly competitive market?</h3>
In a market where there are less to zero restrictions for entry and exit of buyers and sellers in the market dealing in similar commodities, then such a market is known as a perfectly competitive market.
There is no pricing power in the hands of the buyers and sellers in the market, as there is no minimum or maximum limit on the number of sellers in the market, so the supply is not restricted in such a market.
Hence, it can be concluded that market prices are stable in a perfectly competitive market, and it generally increases in a monopolistic market.
Learn more about a perfectly competitive market here:
The best ground on which the defendant ( Company S ) can dismiss the suit filed by the plaintiff (Company T) is the standing to sue.
<h3>What is standing to sue?</h3>
Standing to sue refers to a situation where the plaintiff who has filed the case must prove with appropriate proof of having damages or injuries in respect of the conduct of the defendant.
In the provided case, Company T has to prove that the products of Company S are actually defective through appropriate evidence. If Company Tcan't able to prove their alleged claim before the court, then the case is decided in the favor of the defendant party, that is, Company S.
Therefore, the standing to sue can be used as a ground by Company S for dismissing the claim of Company T.
Learn more about the standing to sue in the related link:
