Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": Orientation.
Explanation:
The primary organization-specific factors are <em>orientation, size of the organization, </em>and<em> degree of centralization</em>. Orientation <em>refers to the function of a company that controls the decisions in regards to purchases</em>. The size of the organization implies decision making will be more centralized in larger firms while more decentralized in smaller firms. Finally, the degree of centralization states that even in highly autonomous corporations, some purchases might be subject to the approval of a manager who confirms the need for the assets being acquired.
<em>Because in Anchor Inc. the purchase decisions are made by engineers the orientation organization-specific factor is more relevant in that company</em>.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The correct answer is lower.
Explanation:
The theory of rational expectations is a hypothesis of economic science that states that predictions about the future value of economically relevant variables made by agents are not systematically wrong and that errors are random (white noise). An alternative formulation is that rational expectations are "consistent expectations around a model," that is, in a model, agents assume that the predictions of the model are valid. The rational expectations hypothesis is used in many contemporary macroeconomic models, in game theory and in applications of rational choice theory.
Since most current macroeconomic models study decisions over several periods, the expectations of workers, consumers and companies about future economic conditions are an essential part of the model. There has been much discussion about how to model these expectations and the macroeconomic predictions of a model may differ depending on the assumptions about the expectations (see the web's theorem). To assume rational expectations is to assume that the expectations of economic agents can be individually wrong, but correct on average. In other words, although the future is not totally predictable, it is assumed that the agents' expectations are not systematically biased and that they use all the relevant information to form their expectations on economic variables.
 
        
             
        
        
        
From the given original cost and the total accumulated depreciation of the old equipment, it can be seen that the value of the equipment should still be $180,000.
                            salvage value = $600,000 - $420,000 = $180,000
Given that it can be sold for only $18,000, the sunken cost is $162,000. 
                            sunken cost = $180,000 - $18,000 = $162,000
        
             
        
        
        
The Two are related because the federal budget expresses the government's current fiscal policy.
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
stgshbn,vhjc,xmcdm yuhjj
Explanation:
gg gv thjk ubhh hv hcf  nbvh j hjv hjhgvbhm  h nbn b bugb  b