Believing one's original theory of the case despite evidence to the contrary is called: <span>belief perseverance.
</span>The term denotes the tendency people to maintain a belief despite new information that firmly contradicts it and <span>it appears that they shouldn't believe anymore. </span>
When we say we make an appeal to convince the audience we are making a request to the public, a serious, crucial or honest one. In this case, to move the audience (the parents) to support our case (go to school later would be easier for them), we have to talk about something that can benefit them from this change, if not they wouldn’t be interested. For example, saying that because is late it isn’t dangerous walking to school, and they wouldn’t have to drive you. In that case, they won’t even have to move from the house and have their own timetable.
Explanation:
Andrea who is working in grocery store was recently fired from her job as a purchaser. The reason for her dismissal as given to her was the continuous decaying of the meat and other produce in the stockroom.
Andrea fail to accomplish the objective as a purchaser in the grocery store. Andrea was not aware of the materials at the stockroom and she purchase more and more produce and meats which leads to the wastage.
She failed to make sure the materials needed were in proper amount. Andrea purchased meat and produce in large quantities, more than what is required. This made an excess of produce and meat and lead to rotting and wastage.
