If you engage in conversation or to communicate this will help solve problems because your communicating if that makes sense
<em><u>sender</u></em>
<em>is</em><em> </em><em>answer</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
<em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
Answer: No,the company is not guilty.
Explanation: In the given case, Hines could not be considered guilty of price discrimination as the price charged from different shops was same. The free samples were distributed for the purpose of campaign and the discretion to which shop they want to provide lies completely with the company.
Price discrimination refers to the practice of charging different prices from different customer which the company have definitely not done.
Hence, Hines could not be charged of guilty of price discrimination.
Answer:
Total direct material variance= $1,000 favorable
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Company had a favorable direct materials price variance of $3,000 and an unfavorable direct materials usage variance of $2,000.
<u>To calculate the total direct material variance, we need to use the following formula:</u>
<u></u>
Total direct material variance= price variance +/- quantity variance
Total direct material variance= 3,000 - 2,000
Total direct material variance= $1,000 favorable
Your answer is going to be true.