Answer:
The level that utilizes the "shotgun" approach to market coverage is:
Intensive Distribution (mass coverage).
Explanation:
This marketing approach aims to reach many consumers through as many sales channels as possible. In this situation, consumers have easy access to the goods or services. The other approaches include Selective Distribution (where few outlets in specific locations are selected for the distribution of the goods and services) and Exclusive Distribution (where limited outlets are chosen because of the target market).
Answer:
Either you quit trying and lose $800 sunk, or you spend $800 for $1,600 total in which the Net from the sale of $1,000 would results in a loss of $600. That means it will be of good to lose $600 than $800.
Explanation:
Since $800 has been spent which means Spending up to an additional $1,000 is still reasonable, but a condition in which you know that the deal will definitely go through.
Secondly since you have already sunk $800, and you know that spending an additional $800 would guarantee it, you can do one among this two options which are either you stop trying and lose the $800 sunk, or you the spend $800 for $1,600($1,000+$600) total in which the Net from the sale of $1,000 would results in a loss of $600($1,000-$800=200,$800-$200=$600). That means it will be of good to lose $600 than $800.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": False.
Explanation:
Company layoffs not only represent a problem to the workers not working anymore for the firm but also to those who keep the job. Layoffs, in general, create uncertainty within a company because the remaining workers typically tend to believe sooner or later they will be laid off as well. Low esteem, engage with the company, and productivity is the result of this scenario.
Answer: Bonds are generally a safer, or less risky, investment than are stocks
Explanation: The biggest pro of investing in stocks over bonds is that history shows, stocks tend to earn more than bonds - especially long term. Additionally, stocks can offer better returns if the company growth is exponential, earning the investor potentially millions on an originally minuscule investment.
Many investors are under the impression that bonds are automatically safer than stocks. After all, bonds pay investors a regular fixed income, and their prices are much less volatile than those of stocks. Conversely, a stock is low-risk for the issuing company, but it's high-risk for investors.
