According to the book, classical conditioning is a sort of learning in which a person learns to link two or more inputs and predict occurrences. To teach a youngster not to run into the street, it must be exposed to stimuli that are associated with not doing so.
Classical conditioning is a behavioral process in which biologically potent stimuli are paired with previously neutral stimuli. It also refers to the learning process resulting from this pairing, in which neutral stimuli usually elicit responses similar to those elicited by strong stimuli.
Classical conditioning differs from operant conditioning. In operant conditioning, the strength of voluntary behavior is modified through reinforcement or punishment. However, classical conditioning can influence operant conditioning in different ways. In particular, classically conditioned stimuli help reinforce operant responses.
Classical conditioning was first studied in detail by Ivan Pavlov. Pavlov conducted experiments on dogs and published the results in 1897. During a gastrointestinal study of Russian physiologists, Pavlov observed that the dogs he used as test subjects drooled when offered meat.
Learn more about Classical Conditioning here : brainly.com/question/7170975
#SPJ4
Answer:
I'm pretty sure its C! :)
Explanation:
<h2>
The money a student spends on rent for his apartment while attending school is not an example of the opportunity cost of going to school.</h2>
Explanation: Opportunity cost is defined as the loss of potential profit from other option when one option is chosen. For each choice we make, potential gain is lost by choosing that alternative.
We invest in university expenses as we believe, it will pay off someday in the future. The people who graduate with a degree gets higher salary and get long term career than a student without a degree.
The nap a student could have enjoyed without attending class is not an example of the opportunity cost as investment in colleges offer much more return.
It would lead to a dangerously powerful national government. They cited the lack of a bill of rights as a dangerous omission<span>.
</span>
