Okay I think there has been a transcription issue here because it appears to me there are two answers. However I can spot where some brackets might be missing, bear with me on that.
A direct variation, a phrase I haven't heard before, sounds a lot like a direct proportion, something I am familiar with. A direct proportion satisfies two criteria:
The gradient of the function is constant s the independent variable (x) varies
The graph passes through the origin. That is to say when x = 0, y = 0.
Looking at these graphs, two can immediately be ruled out. Clearly A and D pass through the origin, and the gradient is constant because they are linear functions, so they are direct variations.
This leaves B and C. The graph of 1/x does not have a constant gradient, so any stretch of this graph (to y = k/x for some constant k) will similarly not be direct variation. Indeed there is a special name for this function, inverse proportion/variation. It appears both B and C are inverse proportion, however if I interpret B as y = (2/5)x instead, it is actually linear.
This leaves C as the odd one out.
I hope this helps you :)
A pergunta não está bem formatada. No entanto, pelo que parece óbvio
Responda:
3 horas
Explicação passo a passo:
Fração de hora gasta por sessão = 3/4 horas por sessão
Se o exercício for feito apenas aos domingos
Número de domingos por mês = 4
Portanto, número de sessões = 4
Fração de horas por sessão * Número de sessões
3/4 * 4 = 3 horas
Portanto, 3 horas são dedicadas ao exercício por mês
8 I guess? The question isn’t very well written
Answer:
6.735
Step-by-step explanation:
im smart
Hope this helps! the answer is option (A). if you still don’t understand after looking at my solution feel free to clarify ya
