1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
taurus [48]
3 years ago
13

How did television most likely alter the attitude of America people toward the Vietnam war?

History
2 answers:
grandymaker [24]3 years ago
7 0

<u>Answer</u>:

The television most likely altered the attitude of American people toward the Vietnam war because it showing the consequences of guns and bombs, and the violence and death which upset the American people.

<u>Explanation</u>:

During the Vietnam War, the American People could see on the television in the news and pictures that came directly from the Vietnamese battlefield the violence and the brutality carried out by both the military forces. This disturbed most Americans and changed their views about the war.

Lana71 [14]3 years ago
5 0
Your answer is it lifted spirits excited people and helped them recover
You might be interested in
Which was an impact of European imperialism on the people of Africa?
Stels [109]
I dont knovfaoahhhhhhhhh
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are 2 enlightenment ideas found in the declaration of independence?
damaskus [11]
Among other concepts, Locke's natural rights and Rousseau's general will and social contract feature greatly.
<span>Prepare for a long one, friend:</span>
4 0
3 years ago
What was the effect of the Reformation on Europe and America?
Ronch [10]

Answer:

C) Conflict between European Countries

Explanation:

Countries that followed the Protestant beliefs were constantly hostile or aggressive to countries that followed the Catholic Church more closely.

4 0
4 years ago
-Checks and balances
Alika [10]

Answer:

1. Congress: Can take in regard of this and possibly veto, or pass this.

Supreme Court(s): May declare legislative/executive actions due to violation in constitution.

2. President: He/She is not mandated to carry out the orders of the Supreme Court. However, the executive branch can place a check on the Supreme Court with/through refusal.

Congress: May not strip the U.S. Supreme Court of jurisdiction over those cases that fall under the Court's original jurisdiction defined in the U.S. Constitution. Congress can limit only the appellate jurisdiction of the Court.

3. President: Returns the unsigned legislation to the originating house of Congress within a 10 day period usually with a memorandum of disapproval or a “veto message.” Congress can override the President's decision if it musters the necessary two–thirds vote of each house.

Supreme Court: Limits. Congress may not strip the U.S. Supreme Court of jurisdiction over those cases that fall under the Court's original jurisdiction defined in the U.S. Constitution. Congress can limit only the appellate jurisdiction of the Court.

4. Congress: The Constitution grants Congress the sole authority to enact legislation and declare war.

Supreme Court: The Supreme Court does not have any enforcement power; the enforcement power lies solely with the executive branch. However, The supreme court may have the power to overturn an executive order by passing legislation that invalidates it.

Explanation:

The question is stating/asking how the other powers will keep the main statement in check, basically meaning, how each powers will evaluate during one of these situations.

Depending on each power, they will be able to evaluate how they should solve the problems.

Congress: These people have the power to veto the president's request, as well as pass it, if they approve.

Supreme Courts: The court has the ability to declare acts (Legislative/Executive) in violation of the constitution.

This goes for all position in the political order in the world, but I have only named a few, if you would like, I can put more if needed.

(Some of the answers were part of info online, so that I could help you, but also help you understand better, as I am not that well in politics)

8 0
3 years ago
What does legalism mean?
Keith_Richards [23]
Strict adherence, or the principle of strict adherence, to law or prescription, especially to the letter rather than the spirit. Theology. the doctrine that salvation is gained through good works. the judging of conduct in terms of adherence to precise laws.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was a positive effect of capitalism
    13·2 answers
  • Russia ranks ____ in the world for the largest land area of any country.
    5·2 answers
  • Were the united states justified in taking away individual rights during world war 1?​
    12·2 answers
  • Ashley is building a vegetable garden in her backyard. 1/4 of the vegetables will be sweet peppers, 40% will be tomatoes, and th
    15·2 answers
  • What best explains why Britain restricted trade with the colonies?
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME ILL GIVE YOU BRAINEST. what is inaccurate about this paragraph and explain why it is. It has to be something in t
    13·1 answer
  • What two states voted Democratic in 2008 that hadn’t done so since 1964.
    8·2 answers
  • How did the king and Parliament view the American colonies?
    10·1 answer
  • What position was a British politician on the opium trade?
    15·1 answer
  • John Maynard Keynes was best known for promoting the idea that governments should:
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!