Answer:
had passed a law which compelled the federal banks to pay tax to the state
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer for your question will be Options A & B
Explanation:
Option A - Interdisciplinarity is necessary due to the complex nature of the world: This is completely valid and we can assume this fact. Many things in our world are not as simple as we think, a daily use object like a phone charger will need several disciplines to come together and create it. <u>This is called interdisciplinarity.</u>
Option B - The disciplines are foundational and necessary to interdisciplinary work: We need that the disciplines involved comply with a logical order, and they are completely necessaries.
Better leadership
Foreign aid
Knowledge
Motivation
I believe the answer is: <span>stage 4- The social order maintaining orientation
During this stage of development, people would start to develop the awareness of how their individual behavior could affect the social group as a whole. People who entered this stage tend to have a sense of 'duty' to society where they live and have a high respect toward authority.</span>
Answer:
Option A: Appeal to unqualified authority
Explanation:
Fallacies of Weak Induction
This is said to take place only occurs the premises used as provided to support for a conclusion, but it is not enough to believe the conclusion.
Types of Fallacies of Weak Induction
1. Appeal to Unqualified Authority, 2. Appeal to Ignorance
3. Hasty Generalization
4. False Cause
5. Slippery Slope
6. Weak Analogy
Appeal to Unqualified Authority
In this type of appeal, an arguer used a statement made by another person as a form of evidence for a conclusion, and usually, that person is not qualified to to make such a statement. It is also defined as when the arguer appeals to an inappropriate or unqualified authority or expert as the basis for accepting a conclusion, therefore the viewpoint of such an individual that is raised is said to be logically irrelevant. It is only when an appeal to a legitimate expert such as eye-witness in court case etc. then it is a type of inductive argument.
