Answer: The recessionary gap will be equal to 1 trillion yen divided by 2.5 or 0.4 trillion yen
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that GDP gap of 1 trillion yen and the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.60. Also, to close the GDP gap, the prime minister has decided to increase government spending. This means that there will be a recessionary gap because the actual GDP will be less than the potential GDP.
Fir the economy to be brought to its potential GDP, the spending of the government will give a stimulus to the economy. Since MPC is 0.6, the multiplier will be:
= 1/1-MPC
= 1/1 - 0.6
= 1/0.4
= 2.5
The government spending will then increase in order to close the recessionary gap as:
∆Y = ∆G × Multiplier
100 = ∆G × 2.5
∆G = 100/2.5
∆G = 40
Therefore, the recessionary gap will be equal to 1 trillion yen divided by 2.5 or 0.4 trillion yen.
First, the quotation for each car model has to be obtained. The quotation must include the taxes including insurance.Then, a comparison is done taking into account the mileage and the maximum allotted budget for the other expenses which is $800.
Answer:
24%
Explanation:
The computation of the average rate of return is shown below;
As we know that
The Average rate of return = Net income ÷ Average investment
where,
Net income is
= (Selling price per unit - totat cost per unit) × additional units sales
= ($212 - $200) × $4,500 units
= $54,000
And, the average investment is
= (cost price + equipment) ÷ 2
= ($418,500 + $31,500) ÷ 2
= $225,000
So, the average rate of return is
= $54,000 ÷ $225,000 × 100
= 24%
<span>This position on grace
sees the convicting and enabling work of the Holy Spirit accompanying the
preaching of the gospel and believes this work is accomplished in every
believer with the Sprit of Jesus Christ. The Sovereign Grace Churches has the
main mission to spread the Gospel of Jesus. </span>
Answer: Lucy can sue Andrew as she is a donee beneficiary of the contract
Explanation:
From the question, we are told that Susan wanted to give a diamond pendant to Lucy, who is her daughter. Susan then entered into a contract with Andrew, who is a dealer that specializes in diamond jewelry.
Susan had promised to pay him if he delivered the pendant to Lucy but later Andrew withdrew from the contract and Lucy wanted to sue him.
In this case, Lucy cannot sue Andrew because she is a donee beneficiary. It should be noted that as a donee beneficiary of the contract, the will only get the benefit of the contract as a gift but the contract is really between Susan and Andrew. She is not a party to the contract technically.
