Is there more to this question? If not I would use a word like Persuade? listeners. Or Engage? listeners.
Answer:
Such results only tell us how well one is programmed to regurgitate mostly useless information, mostly in regards to one of 7 kinds of intelligence.
This can be a good indicator on whether or not a person will be able to handle even higher amounts of regurgitation of information at the university level. The hope is that students will major in a study that will at least expose them to the tools of critical thinking, which is mostly limited to the hard sciences.
“Learners” who score high can will feel overblown grandiose feelings, and see themselves as superior to those with lower scores, regardless of their future accomplishments (or lack of them). “Learners” who score low will tend to feel humbled and maybe depressed, in that they are typecast as being somehow unable to be much of a future contributor to society.
Fortunately, a significant number of people at ANY point of the spectrum of such scoring to see how well trained a monkey they are, realize the absurdity of such scoring, and go on to find out where they DO excel in one of the other 7 kinds of intelligence. They often end up contributing MORE to society, once they find there “gift” where they “score” much higher
Explanation:
What du u mean by the time of this paragraph? Can u be more detail?
Answer:
1. I wish people had done more ablout climate change when they still could make a difference.
2. Only a handful of states are left now.
3. Many are either submerged underwater or they are unlivable due to the air conditions.
4. In fact, even my own home town is becoming a victim of this global disaster.
5. The government has now told us that it is no longer safe for us to breath the air without some form of a filter.
6. We are starting to have to ware either oxygen masks or gas masks.
7. Not even the masks they wore in 2020 will help us now.
Explanation:
