Answer:
D) Shift of the demand curve for Z to the left
Since both the equilibrium quantity and price decreased.
Explanation:
A rightward shift of the demand curve should increase both the equilibrium price and quantity.
A rightward shift of the supply curve should increase the equilibrium quantity and decrease the equilibrium price.
A leftward shift of the supply curve should increase the equilibrium price and decrease the equilibrium quantity.
Answer: Please refer to Explanation
Explanation:
When recording Equipment here the value of the shares at current value should be used and not the cost of the equipment.
DR Equipment $162,250
CR Investment in Pharaoh Company $137,500
CR Gain on Exchange $24,750
(To record Exchange of shares for Equipment)
Workings.
Investment in Pharaoh Company.
= 2,750 shares * $50(purchase price)
= $137,500
Gain on Exchange
= 2,750 shares * (Market Price - Purchase Price)
= 2,750 shares * ( 59 - 50)
= $24,750
Equipment.
= Investment in Pharoah Company + Gain on Exchange
= 137,500 + 24,750
= $162,250
Answer:
see below
Explanation:
Social enterprises participate in commercial activities to solve social problems, improve communities' well-being, and better the environment. They make money through normal trading activities.
<em>Some characteristics of social enterprises include</em>
1. They have a mission to serve the community by initiating and supporting social, environmental, cultural, and economic programs. Social enterprises are not entirely driven by profits but have social missions to achieve.
2. Social enterprises generate the majority of their income through business activities. They are self-reliant as the selling of goods and services is their primary source of revenue.
3. A big proportion of the profits generated by social enterprises is invested in community projects. Social enterprises use profits to achieve their social objectives.
Answer:
Variance of the return = 0.01983
Explanation:
= Σ
/ N - 1
Mean return = 17.88% + -5.16% + 20.39% = 11.0367%
Variance = [(17.88% - 11.0367%)2 + (-5.16% - 11.0367%)2 + (20.39% - 11.0367%)2] /(3 - 1)
Variance = [0.004683 + 0.026233 + 0.008748]/2
Variance = 0.01983
McCulloch v. Maryland represented a power struggle between the State and Federal law. It was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The state of Maryland had attempted to impede operation of a branch of the Second Bank of the United States by imposing a tax on all notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. Though the law, by its language, was generally applicable to all banks not chartered in Maryland, the Second Bank of the United States was the only out-of-state bank then existing in Maryland, and the law was recognized in the court's opinion as having specifically targeted the U.S. Bank.
