Answer:
opportunity cost
Explanation:
The concept of Opportunity cost deals with the idea that individuals, investors, or business owners, due to scarcity of resources, lost possible benefits that could be gained, as he or she chooses alternative choice.
Hence, the underlying reason or factor trade benefits both sides of a trading arrangement is rooted in the concept of OPPORTUNITY COST.
Therefore, the right answer is Opportunity cost.
Answer:
The incomplete part of the question is "Using a cap-and-trade system of tradable emission allowances will eliminate half of the sulfur dioxide pollution at a cost of $1 million per year. If the permits are not tradable, what will be the cost of eliminating half of the pollution? If permits cannot be traded, then the cost of the pollution reduction will be $1 million per year." The full question is attched as picture as well
1) Tradable permit system
Then lower MAC firm will abate the all pollution units
Then as MAC1 = $250, MAC2 = $275
Firm 1 = Consolidated electric
Firm 2 = Commonwealth utility
Then 1 will sell all permits to 2, at a price between $250 & $275.
So total cost of abatement of 20 units = MAC1 * 20
= $250 * 20 Unit
= $5,000
2) Non-tradable permits
Total cost = MC1*10 + MC2*10
= $2,500 + $2,750
= $5,250
Answer: $3,086
Explanation:
Wrote checks totaling $41,500 in
October less $39,460 of these checks cleared in October
Wrote checks totaling $45,321 in November less $44,275 cleared the bank in November
Balance of uncleared checks
In October is $41,500 - $39,460 = $2,040
In November is $45,321 - $44,275 = $1,046
Total outstanding checks on 30 Nov is $2,040+$1,046 = $3,086
Answer:
consequential damages
Explanation:
According to my research on different types of law suits, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Bill can recover the 900 he lost from Carl as consequential damages. These are damages have happened because of one party's failure to meet a certain deadline or contractual obligation and can be proven in court. Therefore since Bill can prove that he lost the 900 because of Carl's negligence he will most likely win that case.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer: Comparative
Explanation:
The comparative message is one of the type of business marketing strategy that helps in promoting the various types of products and the services in the market.
It basically helps in encouraging the improvement and also innovation in the given products to meet the desirable properties in an organization based on the consumer requirement in the market.
The comparative message compare the products in the market with the other competitors in terms of characteristics and features. Therefore, comparative is the correct answer.