1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Semenov [28]
2 years ago
15

The National Labor Relations Board a. enforces antitrust laws against unions. b. is required to approve all collective bargainin

g agreements before they can be enforced. c. acts as a union's representative in collective bargaining. d. enforces workers' rights to unionize.
Law
1 answer:
allochka39001 [22]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The National Labor Relations Board a. enforces antitrust laws against unions  enforces workers' rights to unionize.-d.

You might be interested in
If arrested by private security, Miranda Rights are always provided.<br> False<br> True
fredd [130]

the answers is true true true true true

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Things about justice
Feliz [49]

Answer:

The components of criminal justice include police, prosecution, judiciary, prisons, probation, and parole.

The criminal justice system has multiple and often conflicting objectives: the interests of the victim have to be balanced with the due process rights of the defendant, the broader public interest, as well as considerations of cost effectiveness.

Preventing crime is at least as important as punishing offenders. The three kinds of situational crime prevention, like robbing a bank, involve increasing the effort that offenders must spend to commit a crime, increasing the risk of detection and reducing the rewards gained by criminal behaviour, for example by lowering the amount of cash held in a facility.

The key principles that guide the practice of criminal justice in Western nations include that criminal prosecution should remain a last resort, that criminal justice interventions should be the minimal response necessary (i.e. if a warning is sufficient, don’t send the offender to prison), and that the severity of the sentence should increase as the crime becomes more serious.

Of all crimes, only about 10 per cent are reported to the police. Reasons for that include that the crime was not that serious, it is felt that the police can’t do anything about it or that the victim is worried of not being believed

There are several different ways to punish an offender: financial penalties, community-based punishment (i.e. imprisonment), community service, a curfew, and a residence requirement, among others.

A suspended prison term is especially effective with young or first time offenders as the mere threat of punishment is often sufficient.

The judicial response to crime varies greatly from one society to another, even though the crime rates are similar. In Holland, for example, imprisonments account for about 7 per cent of all sentences imposed, whereas in the US about 70 per cent of sentences involve custody.

We expect our prisons to punish and to rehabilitate – we want offenders to come out as better people. But even if offenders had a change of mind after getting out of prison, their criminal record sticks with them forever and their employment prospects are greatly diminished, worsening the chances to lead a fulfilled life.

In England, it costs about £38,000 ($60,000) per year to house one prisoner. For this reason alone it is important to ensure that no-one is sent to prison unless it is absolutely necessary.

Explanation:

~Himiko Toga~

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. If rules are universal, or if rules are not universal - does that make you feel more secure in making a decision?
crimeas [40]

Answer:

According to me...I won't feel confident when making that decision because that decision will be based on the rules that I must follow and I also believe that when I'm taking a decision is going to be based on what situation you are in.

So decisions are not suppose to be based on rules because everyone have a right to take or make a decision that is suitable for themselves.

8 0
3 years ago
Even if they felt a law was unjust, good US citizens would not participate in a peaceful public protest. is it true or false
olga55 [171]

Answer:

its false

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following situations would not substantiate proper standing to sue​
PtichkaEL [24]

Answer:

The answer is B

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, it is a felony for an auditor to willfully fail to maintain proper records of audits and w
    8·1 answer
  • According to the constitution, congress
    11·1 answer
  • Write down formula of power​
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a career available with the Highway Transportation System?
    14·2 answers
  • Which is a true statement about James McCulloch of McCulloch v. Maryland?
    8·1 answer
  • What law is this breaking and explain why:
    7·1 answer
  • 3. How does the Criminal Justice and Forensic Science Reform Act propose to combat the problems with
    6·1 answer
  • Describe the secret that felt like a knife cutting into Brian why was this thought so upsetting to him?
    5·1 answer
  • What are some of the circumstances that might make a primary source "unreliable" or at least unsuitable to stand alone when exam
    14·1 answer
  • How do the system of checks and balances work ? ( at least two checks /balances for each brand , with real-world example/current
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!