Answer:
write to their senator to support or oppose a candidate
Explanation:
Answer:
As chief executive, the president can implement policy, prepare executive budget for submission to congress, and appoint and remove executive officials.
Explanation:
Answer: the Department of Justice.
Explanation:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation is the independent intelligence security service in the United States it works under the jurisdiction of Department of Justice, US. It is a principle law enforcement agency. FBI is assigned with duties like protection against terrorist activity, protection against cyber attacks, protection of civil rights, detection of white-collar crime, detection of organized crimes and also helps in criminal detection proceedings.
Answer:
The total mass of materials present after a chemical reaction is the same as the total mass before the reaction
Explanation:
The Mass Conservation Act or the Conservation Matter Act proposed by Lavoisier postulates that: "The sum of the masses of the reactant substances is equal to the sum of the masses of the reaction products."
To reach these conclusions, Lavoisier used precise scales involving various elements in sealed containers. The total masses of the elements did not vary before (reactants) and after the reaction (products), remaining constant. Note that if he performed his experiments in an open environment there would be a loss of mass as the substance would react with air.
In this case, if we look at an iron that over time reacts with air (resulting in rust), we notice the variation in its initial mass. That is, it becomes larger after contact between them as it has the mass of iron and the mass of air.
Thus, we can state that the law of conservation of mass states states that the total mass of materials present after a chemical reaction is the same as the total mass before the reaction.
Answer:
in both cases the flyer was presented to the barber before the service was provided.
a) no, because Karl was informed about the mistake and the real price and could then still have decided to take his business elsewhere. but if he then agreed to still have the service performed under the now updated conditions, then that is what the "contract" is basing on.
he has no grounds to claim the other price afterwards.
b) no, because the service provider saw the flyer information, did not object to or correct the information right away, but performed the service instead. now the "contract" is based on that agreement based on the conditions of the flyer.
