1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dexar [7]
3 years ago
14

Kenneth is an employee at ups and is required to be able to lift up to 50lbs one day he was playing basketball with his friends

and injured his back he has been experiencing severe back pain at work and has not been able to lift anything while at work so ups terminated him Did the UPS act legally explain?
Law
1 answer:
maria [59]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

No

Explanation:

No, the UPS employer is not acting legally by firing Kenneth. As long as an employer is able to fulfill all of the requirements of the job then they are protected and cannot legally be fired without proper reason for termination. If the employee gets injured on the job they are eligible for filling a workers' compensation claim. If an employer fires an employee for any on the job related injury then they are doing so illegally and can be sued by the employee for doing so.

You might be interested in
A temporary committee created to study an issue and make a policy recommendation is called a
BaLLatris [955]

Answer:

Task Force

Explanation:

They usually are created to solve a particular problem or current issue. Which is why they are more temporary, than permanent.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Knock knock?
alexandr1967 [171]

Answer:

Joe mama

Explanation:

new version of 'yo mama'

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4.<br> What is a substrate control? Why is it done?
attashe74 [19]

Answer:

a substrate control is an uncontaminated sample

Explanation:

it allows forensic scientiststo compare the two samples to better observe whether a flammable liquid is present

3 0
3 years ago
• Name and explain TWO laws/legislation that protect citizens against human trafficking<br>​
lora16 [44]
The act of 2000 and the Reauthorization Act of 2003-2005.
7 0
3 years ago
The LDF attorneys hoped that the arguments set forth in the Boykin v. Alabama brief would eventually become the basis for the de
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Answer: Woodson v North Carolina and Roberts v Lousianna

Explanation:

In Boykin v. Alabama (1969), the Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the death penalty for the first time.

By 1972, Furman v. Georgia ruled a Georgia death penalty law was cruel and unusual punishment, which is forbidden by the Eighth Amendment. In 1976 there were five "Death Penalty Cases". While Gregg v. Georgia, Jurek v. Texas, and Proffitt v. Florida, confirmed the states´ death penalties, Woodson v. North Carolina and Roberts v. Louisiana overturned the mandatory death sentences.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • William E. Story agreed to pay his nephew, William E. Story II, a large sum of money (roughly equivalent to $75,000 in 2016 doll
    6·1 answer
  • What type of document do you need for an appeal?​
    9·1 answer
  • What two situations must occur to appeal to a higher court in a criminal case?
    6·1 answer
  • A ____ is the term for any driving maneuver in which you need to turn your car around.
    9·1 answer
  • This amendment required states to provide
    7·1 answer
  • Kung ikaw ay magiging gobernador, ano ang iyong ipapangako sa bayan?​
    7·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!
    15·1 answer
  • How does the Family Medical Leave Act protect American workers?
    11·1 answer
  • Fatima signs up to volunteer with the Special Olympics. Which task might she complete as part of her duties?
    10·1 answer
  • Importance of personal identification in the crime investigation
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!