Answer:
The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.
Explanation:
According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Yes, drivers who attentively complete driving task can experience no affect of the danger of driving because he drives the vehicle with great care and focus. If a person maintains normal speed and follow all safety rules of driving will not experience any accident or any type of injury. Those persons who drives car with carelessness can risk the life of themselves as well as other people who walks at the side of the road and vehicles on the road.
There are instances where there is broken traffic lights. The steps to take is explained below;
<h3>What do you do when you are at an intersection with a broken light?</h3>
In case of a blackout of traffic light, or if the traffic signal lights are not working due to an electrical power failure, It is advisable that a person should stop at the intersection and then only move when you know other turning and approaching vehicles, pedestrians etc., have stopped.
It is very important to follow the instruction or directives of the officer who is directing traffic so as to avoid any collision with other vehicles and ease of movement/traffic.
Learn more about Traffic light from
brainly.com/question/1527349
This is true but don’t quote me on that
