Answer:
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
After lunch, the junior representatives listened to an author read from her work. Jamal’s mom had given him some money to get a souvenir of his big day, and jamal decided to buy the author’s book. When she was done with her presentation, jamal approached her and asked if she had any copies for sale. The woman gave him a copy for free and even wrote an inscription inside. She wrote, "I hope you had a blast during the conference. I wish I had someone as ambitious as you working on my campaign. Jamal was touched by her words. He shook the woman’s hand and went back to join the other junior representatives. Based on the author’s description, which word best describes the writer that jamal meets?
a) careless
b) generous
c) demanding
d) disappointing
The answer is b): generous.
Explanation:
The answer is “generous” because when Jamal approached the writer, he likely intended to buy a copy of the writer’s book. However, the writer, a woman, gave Jamal a copy of her book for free, and also inspired him by inscribing the following words inside the book: “I wish I had someone as ambitious as you working on my campaign”. These two acts from the writer point to the fact that the writer was generous with her book, and words of inspiration.
The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.
For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means
- There are two types of tortious interference
- Tortious interference with contract
- Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
- Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project
From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct
Learn more Tort interference from:
brainly.com/question/15058912
Answer:
Explanation:
Also called “legal presumptions;” those which derive their force and effect from the law, rather than their natural tendency to produce belief
Answer: It modify the chemical composition of urine by increasing the taken in of Sodium ion and the ejection of potassium ion in the Kidney.
Explanation:
Aldosterone is an hormone secreted by the adrenal glands. It is the main regulator of salt and water balance in our body. It action has little metabolic reaction on fats, protein and carbohydrates.
In order to respond to the levels of sodium and potassium ions ,kidney releases Renin. The Renin with then act on ANGIOTESIONOGEN(a protein present in the plasma).
Renin changes ANGIOTENSINOGEN into ANGIOTENSIN 1 . Conversely, it is then converted into ANGIOTENSIN 2. ANGIOTENSIN 2 stimulates ALDOSTERONE from the Adrenal glands to increase the absorption of potassium and sodium ion in the collecting ducts.
URINE WILL HAVE FEWER SODIUM AND HIGHER POTASSIUM