Answer: Yes, I agree with Graeter’s decision to stop franchising?.
Explanation:
Graeter’s decision to stop franchising was simply to maintain the quality of their products.
If I was in his position, I'll also like to maintain our products quality. It is vital to keep the family business while also following the laid down principles by those before me. Hence, I agree with his decision. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Option D is correct.
Explanation:
Every single offered proclamation are right is the response in light of the fact that under the Double-declining-balance depreciation since it has more devaluation costs when contrasted with different strategies for depreciation.It isn't taking the leftover worth while figuring the deterioration it considers at end year depreciation is determined by taking the distinction of a year ago equalization and rescue value.Under this strategy deterioration is determined on balance measure of depreciation or book value of assets.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer: D. Heidi's share of profits is split among the remaining 3 partners.
Explanation: A general partnership is a form of business arrangement by which two or more individuals agree create a business, sharing in all assets, profits, and financial and legal liabilities. However, unless there is a signed written agreement between partners when starting the business, with a clause setting out what would happen on the occurrence of death, the general partnership dissolves after the death of a partner. If the partnership terminates, then the assets and outstanding liabilities are all sold and the proceeds are divided equally among the partners. Therefore, Heidi's share of profits is split among the remaining 3 partners.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The amount of taxpayers that are part of the "older generation" is slowly rising and is higher than the amount in 1997.
Explanation:
Remember to run a successful government, you must have the income in which to run the government programs. Most of these funds come from taxpayer's. In this case, it is clear that younger people generally make more as well as are generally healthy, leading to a large amount of input of money into the government, with fewer withdrawals. This would give a huge boost to the government budget. Older people on the other hand tend to not work as much, so their taxes are generally lower. They also withdraw more from the Government through Social Security, and so leaves the government with a negative balance from them in most cases. 
The chart on the other hand shows a <em>increase of percentage of older people</em>, which leaves a large gap in between the surplus and the spending, leading to a decrease of funding for the government. If this continues, the government would lose money, and would have to cut programs or face collapse. To fix this, they either have to, like stated above, cut programs, or give more taxes. Both are unacceptable to the American Public, which is what makes the government, as well as the average citizen, worried about the US government's funding surplus.
~
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
We can find the increase in operating income for each $ 1,000 increase in revenue per month by finding the contribution margin ratio and the multiplying it with the increase operating income of $ 1,000 each.
The formula to find the contribution margin ratio is :-
Contribution margin ratio = Contribution margin per unit / Selling price per unit
 = 12 / 20 = 60%
The increase in operating income = Contribution margin ratio * Revenue
 = 60 % * 1,000
 = $ 600
The calculations are shown below :-
Selling price per unit = $ 20
Variable cost per unit = $ 8
Contribution margin per unit = Selling price per unit - Variable cost per unit
 = $ 20 - $ 8 = $ 12