Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
First,You have to realize that if you multiply the amount of food by something, you multiply the amount of calories. if some piece of food is 100 calories what happens if you eat 2? you get 2 times that number of calories. Same fi you eat half of one of that kind of food. You get half the amount of calories.
Here he makes 1 1/2 (one and a half) times the amount. Now, if this is confusing you just need to realize that multiplying by this is the same as multiplying by 1+1/2. Say, again, a piece of food is 100 calories. Multiplying it by this would look like the following.
100(1+1/2)
100*1 + 100*1/2
100+50
150
So if you ever have a mixed number like this you could split it up into an addition problem and then distribute hat you're multiplying. Another solution is to multiply by the improper fraction, which here is 3/2, so 100*3/2=150 as well. Let me know if you don't get how to get the improper fraction or how to multiply fractions.
Now, super simple, just multiply the calories by that number.
310(1+1/2) = 310(3/2)
310 + 155 = 930/2
465 = 465
Kinda showed how to multiply by fractions, still if you don't get it let me know.
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
Parallel lines have the same gradient.
A line with a slope of zero is a horizontal line. Although two lines that have a slope of zero will result in two parallel lines, not all parallel lines are horizontal lines. Since the question is asking for which statement <u>must</u> be true, option A is incorrect.
If the slopes of two lines are negative reciprocals, they are perpendicular to each other. This is because the product of the gradients of 2 perpendicular lines is -1. Let the gradient of the first line be A and the other be B.
AB= -1


Thus, option B is incorrect too.
Undefined slopes gives vertical lines. Like option A, if two lines have an undefined slope, they will be parallel to each other. However since parallel lines are nit necessarily vertical lines, option C is also incorrect.
Answer: No, they are not collinear.
Answer:
wdym get rid of the "stupld"
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>A.</h3>
See below for a graph
<h3>B.</h3>
The inverse of a function appears on a graph as the reflection of the function across the line y=x. This is because the inverse relation is effectively the same relation with the variables x and y swapped. Here, the graphs of f(x) and g(x) are mirror images of each other across the line y=x, so we can see they are inverse functions.
The same technology allows us to graph y=f(g(x)) and y=g(f(x)). Both are graphs of y=x, as expected.