Answer:
v=4/7
Step-by-step explanation:
81/8 = 1/3v + 25/8 - 23/6v
-25/8 -25/8
56/8 = 1/3v -23/6v
56/8 = 24/6v
24/6 / 56/8
4/7
Answer:
500,000 pages
Step-by-step explanation:
1 / 5000 = 100 / x
x = 5000(100)
x = 500,000
To find the correct polynomial, we can use the answers to help us out. The middle variable must be the sum of +2 and another number; the last number in the equation must be the product of +2 and the other number.
Knowing this information, we can use the process of elimination to find the exact polynomial that contains the factor (3x + 2).
A) This can't be it because to get -x as the middle variable, you would need to add -3 and +2. However, -3 x +2 doesn't equal -4.
B) This equation isn't the right one because to get +8 you need to add +6 + 2. However, the product of these two isn't -8.
C) Can't be correct because +2 and -7 = -5, but 2 x -7 = -14...not -9.
D) Is the correct answer because you can add 2 and -1 to get +1. (There is an understood +1 in front of the x in the equation.) The product of 2 and -1 equals -2, which happens to be the last number inside this equation. Therefore, this (D) is the correct answer choice.
Hope I could help you out! If my math is incorrect, or I didn't provide the answer you were looking for, please let me know. However, if the answer was correct and well explained, please consider marking it <em>Brainliest</em>.
Have a good one!
God bless.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Show that if 3x – 7 = 5, then x = 4.
Here, our given statement is 3x – 7 = 5, and we're asked to prove x = 4.
x=4
Statements Reasons
1. 3x – 7 = 5 Given
2. 3x – 7 + 7 = 5 + 7 Addition of 7 to equation (1)
3. 3x + 0 = 5 + 7 Substitution of –7 + 7 = 0 into (2)
4. 3x = 5 + 7 Substitution of 3x + 0 = 3x into (3)
5. 3x = 12 Substitution of 5 + 7 = 12 into (4)
6. 3x⁄3 = 12⁄3 Dividing equation (5) by 3
7. x = 12⁄3 Substitution of 3x⁄3 = x into (6)
8. x = 4 Substitution of 12⁄3 = 4 into (7)
Is there such a thing as being too descriptive? Yep, and that was it, since over half the proof was devoted to telling the reader how to do arithmetic. We'll typically take numerical computation for granted, and write proofs like this:
Answe no no no the first one
Step-by-step explanation: I didn't see the last part it's the first one
