B
Area B of the graph shows the activation energy required if an enzyme was not present
Explanation:
Reactions with high activation energy cannot occur spontaneously. Enzymes are responsible for lowering this activation energy and enabling reactions to occur at a faster pace than natural. An example is carbonic anhydrase enzyme that enables increased rates of carbon dioxide dissolving in and out of blood plasma.
Enzymes distort the bond of reactants such that they become unstable ( this raises the reactants Gibbs free energy). The bonds therefore break and rearrange to form the products of lower and stable energy states.
Learn More:
For more on activation energy check out;
brainly.com/question/10507976
brainly.com/question/5280701
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer: alternative A.
Explanation: In this case, we will consider people that already have had a heart attack. In this specific group of 1,000 people, 236 exercised regularly and had gone through this situation.
We can infer that 23.6% of people who exercised regularly have experienced that by dividing 236/1,000= 0.236= 23.6%.
If 236 people exercised, 1,000-236=764 didn't exercise regularly prior to their heart attacks, so 74.6% were considered to be sedentary.
If there's 0.236 chance out of 1 to exercise and still have a heart attack compared to 0.764 out of 1 to be sedentary and have the same experience, we can divide both ratios to compare them, so 0.236/0.764= 0.3089.
Alternative A claims that people who exercise have around 0.5 chance of having heart attacks compared to people who don't. Since our ratio resulted in 0.3089, we consider this number the closest to 0.5. Alternative <u>B is absurd because in order for people who exercise to have 2x the risk compared to people who don't, the number of people who exercised and went through that must be 2x bigger than people who didn't</u>. Alternative <u>C doesn't apply as well, because we already verified that the chance people who exercise have a heart attack equal to 23,6%. </u>
<u />
So it should have a similarities because the words makes sense
Answer:
According to Lamarck, organisms altered their behavior in response to environmental change. ... Their changed behavior, in turn, modified their organs, and their offspring inherited those "improved" structures.
What is the chart? Can you show us what it says?
