Answer:
Part IV shows the narrator's considerations about the story, while the other parts present the story itself.
Explanation:
"The nose" is a short story written by Nicholau Gogol that portrays the fantasy story of a nose that came out of its owner's face and took on a life of its own and decides to live independently. The short story is a satire and is divided into several parts.
Part IV proves to be the most different of all, since it counts on the narrator's considerations, the most "nosense" points of the narrative, while the other parts are summarized to tell the facts that compose the story itself.
Even though it is a little bit complicated to distinguish the different options, these are the answers:
1. Oliver Cromwell was Lord Protector of the Commonwealth of England, Scotland, and Ireland from 1653 until his death (1658).
2. King Charles I was executed by Puritans in January 1649, since he rejected the demand of the English Parliament for the establishment of a constitutional monarchy.
3. The Commonwealth of England was created after the end of the Second Civil War and the execution of Charles I, in 1649, and it lasted until 1660. During that time, England, Wales, Ireland, and Scotland were ruled as a republic.
4. Theaters in London closed between 1642 and 1660.
5. The office of the Lord Protector was created in 1653.
6. The English Civil Wars (there were three of them in this period) took place between 1642 and 1651. The First Civil War took place between 1642 and 1646. It was a conflict between supporters of the monarchy of Charles I and those who rejected it.
Answer:
Twelve years ago, Barack Obama introduced himself to the American public by way of a speech given at the Democratic National Convention, in Boston, in which he declared, “There is not a black America and a white America and Latino America, an Asian America; there’s the United States of America.” Few of us believed this to be true, but most, if not all of us, longed for it to be. We vested this brash optimist with our hope, a resource that was in scarce supply three years after the September 11th terrorist attacks in a country mired in disastrous military conflicts in two nations. The vision he offered—of national reconciliation beyond partisan bounds, of government rooted in respect for the governed and the Constitution itself, of idealism that could actually be realized—became the basis for his Presidential campaign. Twice the United States elected to the Presidency a biracial black man whose ancestry and upbringing stretched to three continents.
At various points that idealism has been severely tested. During his Presidency, we witnessed a partisan divide widen into an impassable trench, and gun violence go unchecked while special interests blocked any regulation. The President was forced to show his birth certificate, which we recognized as the racial profiling of the most powerful man in the world. Obama did not, at least publicly, waver in his contention that Americans were bound together by something greater than what divided them. In July, when he spoke in Dallas after a gunman murdered five police officers, he seemed pained by the weight of this faith, as if stress fractures had appeared in a load-bearing wall.
It is difficult not to see the result of this year’s Presidential election as a refutation of Obama’s creed of common Americanism. And on Wednesday, for the first time in the twelve years that we’ve been watching him, Obama did not seem to believe the words he was speaking to the American public. In the White House Rose Garden, Obama offered his version of a concession speech—an acknowledgement of Donald Trump’s victory. The President attempted gamely to cast Trump’s victory as part of the normal ebb and flow of political fortunes, and as an example of the great American tradition of the peaceful transfer of power. (This was not, it should be recalled, the peaceful transfer of power that most observers were worried about.) He intended, he said, to offer the same courtesy toward Trump that President George W. Bush had offered him, in 2008. Yet that reference only served to highlight the paradox of Obama's Presidency: he now exists in history bracketed by the overmatched forty-third President and the misogynistic racial demagogue who will succeed him as the forty-fifth. During his 2008 campaign, Obama frequently found himself—and without much objection on his part—compared to Abraham Lincoln. He may now share an ambivalent common bond with Lincoln, whose Presidency was bookended by James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson, two lesser lights of American history.
Explanation:
Answer:
They face adjustment issues, economic isssues depending on how the employees respond to the change. The culture of the area, the language the people speak there, and of course Marketing.
Explanation:
When companies move manufacturing to a different country they mainly ask questions about marketing, money, and how they will adjust and operate.
I hope I've helped! :D
Ridden because rode doesn't sound correct when u read it out loud w/the sentence. Ridden to me sounds better w/the sentence.