The best explanation for the rise in economist salaries and the fall in accounting salaries would be (B) The supply of economists must have decreased, and the supply of accountants must have increased.
<h3>Why is this the best explanation?</h3>
When there is a decrease in the supply of a commodity, its prices will go up. The salaries of economists went up because the number of economists available, decreased. 
When there is an increase in the supply of something, the price will decrease. This is why the accountants saw their salaries decrease - the number of accountants available increased. 
In conclusion, option B is correct. 
Find out more on demand and supply at brainly.com/question/4804206.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Explanation:
The preference committee members are as follows:
Member 1 prefers a to b and b to c
Member 2 prefers c to a and a to b
Member 3 prefers b to c and c to a
The order of this problem can be solved:
Preference for 1, 2 and 3 are as below:
1. a then b then c
2. c then a then b
3. b then c then
Member 1 knowing advantage , will always disagree with 2 and 3 so that he can win when it comes to vote
So, 2 and 3 in order to win , will have to cooperate with each other.
As we can see that the least suitable option according to Member 2 and Member 3 are b and a respectively. Therefore they would not consider supporting either b or a.
So the possible option of Member 2 and Member 3 supporting will be C.
Therefore both 2 and 3 will agree on C.
The predicted outcome of the game is C.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Both A and B are correct.
Explanation:
Variance analysis help the business to identify the deviation from their budgeted expenditures. The budget cost or volume is analyzed against the actual expenditure or production volume. Variance can be favorable or unfavorable. An unfavorable material price variance will increase the cost of finished goods.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Explanation:
The formula for GDP is
GDP = C + I + G + NX
C = consumption
I  = Investment by business and household purchases by individuals 
G = Government  Expenditures
NX = foreign trade.
The first thing you can do is knock out foreign trade.
I think you can dispense with Government expenditures as well all though a school is an arm of government.
I think investment is what you have to look at carefully because it does include charitable organizations.  We'll come back to this.
Consumption is what it sounds like it sounds.
You can't answer this in any other way than to know how the company writes it off. It is an asset that goes from some value to 0. It no longer exists on their books. So it decreases their assets. It is balanced on their books by calling it an expense I think and that further has impact on their books.
So they are decreasing their value (albeit by a small amount -- they've already bought new computers).
I'm not sure about this, but I think what has happened is that the GDP is going to go down. Their investment has decreased by being written off.