From the feeling that God does not exist is sartre calls forlornness the consequence
<h3>What is
sartre calls forlornness the consequence?</h3>
According to Sartre, when we are left to confront our decisions and consequences alone, we feel as though we are deserting. Since, according to the skeptical viewpoint,
God does not exist, people cannot use God as a crutch and must face the consequences on their own.
The options are missing
A) from the feeling that God does not exist
B) from the chaos of the universe
C) from the randomness of self-determination
D) from the anguish of individuality
Thus, option A is correct.
For more details about sartre calls forlornness the consequence, click here:
brainly.com/question/2917990
#SPJ1
Answer:
I'll give you a couple of ideas!
1. Problem: You are a detective trying to solve a case that has been cold for years. You have eliminated all but two suspects. Which one is the right one?
Solution: You decide to look carefully at the evidence and *gasp* one piece of evidence leads you to the right one!
2. Problem: You are a mage about to partake in a quest against a terrible group of goblins with your party. If only you can find your darn wizarding staff!
Solution: After hours of searching, you realize that it was in your hand the whole time.
I don't know if you prefer any of these topics, and I would be happy to give you more prompts!
Yes, I agree. But to a limit. For example, if someone stole money, the thief should repay the money and spend sometime in jail because he needs to repay the money of course and spend time in jail and then be released when the person learned his lesson in order toto teach the person a lesson and for wasting peoples time finding him. Another example would be if someone killed a person in cold blood then he should be repaid a life for a life and an eye for an eye. But if a person tortured and killed someone, then he shouldn't be tortured himself because it's inhuman and someone has to do it and if someone does exactly what a he does, the person is no better. The criminal should be executed because the lesson a life for a life applies. Religion wise, for example: the Bible does show that God wiped people who did wicked things because they corrupted the earth and did inhuman things that they did not deserve to live. But then there is the part of the Bible that says if someone strikes your cheek, let him strike your other cheek. So i believe that you should be loving as a human and forgive(but if someone does something that can be forgiven or not inhuman such as stealing then he doesn't deserve to die but to be taught a lesson) something that is inhuman. So for capital punishment, it should only apply if someone else loses a life or if the criminal did something inhuman and that he would never change from his ways but just continue corrupting the earth.
The action of solving a problem, dispute, or contentious matter.
