Answer:
The ratio of the income in 2003 would be $54,300.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that the yearly income for an individual with an associate degree in 2001 was $53,166 and 2013 was $59,970, we can determine that in 12 years there was a wage increase of $ 6,804 (59,970 - 53,166). Thus, on average, each year there was a salary increase of $ 567 (6,804 / 12). Therefore, given that in 2003 two years had passed since the starting value of $ 53,166, following this reasoning and without inflationary or recessionary changes, this person's salary should have been $ 54,300 (53,166 + 567 x 2).
<h2>
<em>Answer:</em></h2><h3>
<em>-</em><em>2</em><em>x</em><em>-</em><em>2</em></h3>
<em>
</em>
<em>Hope </em><em>it</em><em> helps</em>
<em>Good </em><em>luck</em><em> on</em><em> your</em><em> assignment</em>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Just using pythagorean theorem,
13.2²+16.9²=c²
174.24+285.61=c²
c²=√459.85
c= 21.4441134114
c = 21.4 (nearest tenth)
Y=2x+0
the y intercept is 0 and the slope is 2/1
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
'll just help with proving whether she is correct.
First of all, a fraction divided by a fraction can be made into multiplication since the division of two fractions is kinda difficult
so remember keep, change, flip
keep the first fractions, change the division symbol into multiplication, then flip the fraction i.e. 1/2 becomes 2/1
so 5/2 divided by 1/4 becomes
5/2 * 4/1
which then solved becomes
20/2 which is simplified to 10
Hope this helps :)
