Answer: Someone who knows about the Holocaust ,it might not be a Jews
Explanation: The
Holocaust was an experience that possibly those that experienced it might not be alive to tell the story. It is possible the best person to write this history is not a Jew because there is high tendency that the Jews that existed then might have been killed only those that witnessed the killings will be in the best position to write about it. To me the best person to write about the history of Holocaust is someone who experienced it but not necessarily a Jew
Answer:
A. True.
Explanation:
In United States, the professional organization meant for the social workers is known as the National Association of Social Workers’. The organization provides any resources, guidance, information, etc to the social workers and its members.
Social workers who are practicing in different health care settings shall stick to and shall promote the values and ethics of the social work profession, using the National Association of Social Workers’ Code of Ethics as a guide to deal with problems of the client and take ethical decision making.
Hence the answer is TRUE.
Answer:
The type of sampling used in Jankowski's study of gangs is Option D. Stratified sampling.
Explanation:
With stratified sampling, the researcher will partition the population into different groups, usually based on some characteristic that is common to that group. In this case, it was the different kinds of gang membership. Then, the researcher will take a sample of people within each specific group using another sampling method like simple random sampling for instance. The groups that are used in stratified sampling are called strata. Another example would be a national survey that is divided into strata of the different major ethnic groups that comprise the national population.
The correct answer for this question is "a re-interpretation of facts based on new evidence and resulting in new conclusions." The statement that best describes consensus historiography is that it is <span>a re-interpretation of facts based on new evidence and resulting in new conclusions.</span>
Answer:so my name can go down in history
Explanation:
