Explanation:
Ethical doubts about genetic engineering motivate a view that many philosophers favour: that genetic therapy to eliminate disease and disability is ethically acceptable, given that the risks can be overcome.
But genetic enhancement is ethically problematic. The line between enhancement and therapy is difficult to draw.
Studies show people who are physically attractive are likely to earn more than those considered to have below-average looks. Does this mean “ugliness” is a disability that ought to be corrected by genetic engineering?
Or, similarly, is having a below-average IQ a disability, something that should be subject to change through gene-editing?
Chlamydia, if left untreated, it leads to the vaginal area unable to fertilize
The human movement is 4
exercises that use body weight is 5
contracting muscle is 12
holding a contraction is 8
decreasing the angle is 6
strengthening is 3
increasing is 7
lengthening of a muscle is 10
maximum amount of force is 1
isolating muscles is 15
undesirable movements is 14
shortening muscles is 9
sustained contraction is 2
opposing action is 13
increasing the weight is 16
They protect patient confidential information and are required to by hoops law
They may be dehydrated, dehydration causes both of these symptoms