Two landmark decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court served to confirm the inferred constitutional authority for judicial review in the United States: In 1796, Hylton v. United States was the first case decided by the Supreme Court involving a direct challenge to the constitutionality of an act of Congress, the Carriage Act of 1794 which imposed a "carriage tax".[2]
The Court engaged in the process of judicial review by examining the
plaintiff's claim that the carriage tax was unconstitutional. After
review, the Supreme Court decided the Carriage Act was not
unconstitutional. In 1803, Marbury v. Madison[3]
was the first Supreme Court case where the Court asserted its authority
for judicial review to strike down a law as unconstitutional. At the
end of his opinion in this decision,[4]
Chief Justice John Marshall maintained that the Supreme Court's
responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary
consequence of their sworn oath of office to uphold the Constitution as
instructed in Article Six of the Constitution.
B. None of these are examples of permissible limitations on the freedom of speech - this is the answer that represents an instance where the government can/or can't limit what people say.
Monopoly quantity produces too little output at too high a cost but efficient quantity is where the demand equals the marginal cost.
<h3>What is a monopoly?</h3>
A monopoly refers to the dominant position of an industry or a sector by one company.
The efficient quantity of output is where the demand highly equals the marginal cost whereas monopoly quantity produces too little output at too high a cost.
Learn more about Monopoly here:
brainly.com/question/5992626
#SPJ2
i believe it is B I am also stuck on this question but B sounds the best.
U should be nice to people even if they dont deserve it
