Answer:
I would probably say state because the state holds the business license but I'm not 100% sure
Answer:
So before you do any thing you want to make sure you have gloves on so you can try to pull finger prints. Second you want to get the gun and clear (pulling the slide back look down to where the mag is then through the barrel )after pick up the bullets then you can use the liver temp of the body to determine a time of death. Next you will want to run the ballistics on the gun(make sure it was recently fired) then make sure the bullets are the same caliber as the gun after you find the match you want to do a autopsy on the body to find any bruises gang tatts or anything he recently ate after that you can use the finger prints found at the crime scene and the food he had recently ate to determine where he was and who was with him.
Explanation:
You are welcome mark me brainliest please
Answer:
No, because that's david's money so he can do anything he wants with it, PBS just wants that money & trying to find a way to get it which is trying to sue David. So no, PBS will not win the lawsuit, David will win the lawsuit.
Explanation:
Answer:
No, as hearsay not within any exception.
Explanation:
(B) The sketch is inadmissible on hearsay grounds. Under Rule 801 of the Federal Rules, prior identification can be admissible, and the sketch could be deemed a prior identification. However, to be admissible, the witness must be there to testify at trial and be subject to cross-examination. The witness in this case is unavailable; hence, this exception does not apply. (D) is therefore incorrect. (A) applies to documentary evidence and has no relevance to this question. (C) is likewise not applicable, because this exception applies only to information within the personal knowledge of the public employee. In this case, the public employee gained the knowledge from the hearsay statements of an absent witness.