We have that
(14x2 - 3x3 + 9x4) - (-14 + 13x3 + 11x4)=<span>14x2 - 3x3 + 9x4 +14 - 13x3 - 11x4
</span>(14x2 - 16x3 +14 - 2x4)
then
-2x4-16x3+14x2+14=0--------------> this is the <span>standard form
simplify </span><span>dividing the entire expression by two
</span><span>-x4-8x3+7x2+7=0
the answer is
</span>-x4-8x3+7x2+7=0<span>
</span>
The best way to answer this question is to set up the first sentence as a ratio of large bandages to total bandages. You would write 5 large bandages to 7 total bandages to 7 total bandages. Then you would make this equivalent to x number of large bandages to 60 total. It would look like this 5:7 = x:60. You could use cross products to multiply 60 by 5 to get 300. 7 times x also should equal 300. Unfortunately, this example will not leave us with a whole number of bandages, but 300/7 is a repeating decimal or a mixed number (42 6/7 large bandages).
Answer:
NO this set is not equivalent
Step-by-step explanation:
Okay the way you find out if a pair of ratios are equal is you would divide the denominator and nominator with each other, so: 13/7 and 9/4. But sense the answer would be in decimal form and cant be simplified this wouldnt be considered equivalent. Also if you divide 7 by 4 you get a different answer than when you do 13 divided 9.
Answer:
y = 4x - 1
Step-by-step explanation:
Equation y = 4x - 1 matches the function described in the table.
Answer:
can you show a link to the graph
Step-by-step explanation:
it will help me answer
