Answer:
Brief summary of the case:
The case deals about the evolution of kindle by Company A. When the company decided to introduce kindle, its price was $399 in 2007. Company A understood that to be successful against the huge competitors, kindle must be priced low. It must be highly reliable, many features and elegance must be provided in the design of kindle. "Company A- designed kindle in State C where the research and development expertise is available.
Market research firm "IS," estimated that the manufacturing cost of kindle is about $185. The expensive components of the kindle are the display used in the Electronic ink technology and wireless cord. Company A contracted with Country C's company to produce the display. A manufacturer in Continent A produced a wireless cord of $13. Many components were contracted to the different countries to reduce the cost of the kindle to be competitive. Now, kindle became the competitor to the massive companies.
Determine if the company has decided to manufacture all the components of Electronic reader K in Country U:
If Company had decided to manufacture all the components in Country U, then it would have been more expensive. Company A cannot sell that at an affordable price. Increase in the cost of the components would increase the overall cost of the Electronic reader K. The most important strategy of Company A is to minimize the cost of the product to increase the number of sales.
Increase in the manufacturing cost will dilute their competitive advantage and it increases the cost of the product. It will lower the sales and the buyers would prefer to use the competitors' products, which are cheaper.
Determine if the company has decided to manufacture all the components of Tablet F in Country U:
It would be expensive if they decide to manufacture the components in Country U. It will not affect the sales number like Electronic reader K. as Tablet F is multipurpose. People will prefer quality and specifications than price.
Conclusion:
Manufacturing in Country U would be expensive and it increases the overall cost of the product. It would affect sales of the products.
Suppose in 2010, the producer price index increases by 1.5 percent. As a result, the economists are most likely to predict that the consumer price index will increase in the future.
The producer price index is used in order to measure inflation from the perspective of costs to industry. Thus, the producer price index measures the cost of a group of goods and services which are purchased by firms.
Whereas the consumer price index refers to an average of the prices received by producers of goods and services at all the stages of the production process. Thus, when the producer price index increases by 1.5 percent, this is the indication that consumer price index will increase in the future.
Hence, higher producer prices means that consumers will pay more when they buy.
To know more about producer price index here:
brainly.com/question/6335529
#SPJ4
Answer:
Based on the information supply of cards is more elastic (price sensitive) than that of roses
Explanation:
Price elasticity of supply is defined as the sensitivity of quantity supplied to changes in price.
The formula is given below
Price elasticity of supply= Change in quantity supplied ÷ Change in price
In this scenario the demand for both roses and cards increases, however the price of roses increases more.
This implies that the denominator in the formula is higher in roses resulting in smaller price elasticity of supply.
The elasticity of supply for cards is higher than that of roses, so it is more sensitive to changes in price.
Cards can be stored from year to year so the labour for maintaining a stock of cards is low with resultant low price.
On the other hand roses require care to grow. It requires watering, application of chemicals to treat infestation and so on. So suppliers tend to push the extra cost of growing roses to the buyers
<span>Up until 2009 a wood treating facility was operated at Koppers
The wood treating facility lasted for more than 90 years (it operated from </span>1916 to 2009).
The operation is forced to close after government found unsafe carbon footprints from the substance that used for Koppers' operation.<span />
Answer:
A. Cash, Salary payable, and Retained earnings
Explanation:
The post-closing trial balance is prepared after recording the closing entries with respect to all revenues earned, all expenses incurred, and the cash dividend
.
It should be always matched and equal that means the total of the debit column and the total of credit column is equaled and zero.
So, the most appropriate option is A.
